<div dir="ltr">munin specfically says:<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;border-left-width:1px;border-left-color:rgb(204,204,204);border-left-style:solid;padding-left:1ex"> IMPORTANT: On 32-bit systems the data source for this plugin uses 
32-bit counters, which makes the plugin unreliable and unsuitable for 
most 100-Mb/s (or faster) interfaces, where traffic is expected to 
exceed 50 Mb/s over a 5 minute period.  This means that this plugin is 
unsuitable for most 32-bit production environments. To avoid this 
problem, use the ip_ plugin instead.  There should be no problems on 
64-bit systems running 64-bit kernels.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>obviously this is cacti, but i'd imagine that the plugins aren't different in how they measure, and therefore this problem.</div><div><br>
</div><div>just thought i'd throw that in for posterity and google searching :) </div></div><div class="gmail_extra"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Sun, Nov 17, 2013 at 1:41 PM, matz <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matzarah@asiade.net" target="_blank">matzarah@asiade.net</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
  
    
  
  <div bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
    <div>It depends on the polling interval.  A
      32 bit counter can record a maximum of <span>4,294,967,295
        bytes of data transferred on an interface.  At a 5 minute
        polling interval, this is 114 Mbps (</span><span><span>4,294 MB * 8 / 300 sec)</span>, 1 minute polling
        interval this is 572Mbps (4,294 MB * 8 / 60 seconds) before it
        starts to break. </span><br><div><div class="h5">
      <br>
      On 16/11/2013 9:30 PM, PRK wrote:<br>
    </div></div></div><div><div class="h5">
    <blockquote type="cite">
      <p>As a slight digression, I've usually seen a 32 bit counter
        break between 200 & 300Mbit (IIRC), not at the 100Mbit
        boundary you're describing.</p>
      <p>prk.</p>
      <div> </div>
      <p>On 2013-11-16 21:11, Alex Maclaren wrote:</p>
      <blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px;border-left:#1010ff 2px solid;margin-left:5px">
        <div>Hi Daniel,<br>
          We had a problem where cacti couldn't graph speeds of over
          100mbit in graphs.<br>
          We found you have to set the data query data type to the
          64-bit counter type when creating the graph.<br>
          Hope this helps.<br>
          <br>
          Regards,<br>
          <div>
            
            <div style="font-weight:bold;font-family:Tahoma,sans-serif;color:#666699"><span style="font-size:11.0pt">Alex Maclaren</span><br>
              <span style="font-size:10.0pt"></span></div>
          </div>
          <br>
          On 16/11/2013 7:17 PM, Greg Cockburn wrote:</div>
        <blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px;border-left:#1010ff 2px solid;margin-left:5px">
          <div dir="ltr">Hi Daniel,
            <div> </div>
            <div>You might find it is snmpd on the host if it is Linux.</div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>The SNMP daemon doesn't have permissions to get the
              speed of the interface and so defaults to 1000Mbit.</div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>If you add:</div>
            <div>interface eth0 6 1000000000</div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>to your snmpd.local.conf file, this will fix the
              problem.</div>
            <div><a href="https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/250549" target="_blank">https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/250549</a></div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>Of course maybe I am barking up the wrong tree, but
              this has been a problem for me in the past.</div>
            <div> </div>
            <div>Good luck.</div>
            <div>Greg.</div>
            <div> </div>
          </div>
          <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
            <br>
            <div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Nov 15, 2013 at 11:43 PM,
              Daniel Watson <span><<a href="mailto:daniel@glovine.com.au" target="_blank">daniel@glovine.com.au</a>></span>
              wrote:<br>
              <blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
                <div dir="auto">
                  <div>Hey Noggers</div>
                  <div> </div>
                  <div>We use cacti for our bandwidth monitoring</div>
                  <div> </div>
                  <div>Recently I have noticed that none of my servers
                    graphs are showing the transit peaking over 100mbit
                    which is untrue as all servers are on 1GBit ports, I
                    have verified this numerous times, but yet cacti
                    won't graph above 100mbit</div>
                  <div> </div>
                  <div>Can somebody please tell me how I can fix cacti
                    to graph up to 1gbit?</div>
                  <div> </div>
                  <div>Appreciate the assistance in advance</div>
                  <div> </div>
                  <div>D.</div>
                  <div>
                    <div>
                      <div>
                        <div style="font-family:verdana;font-size:11px"><br>
                          Sent from my iPad</div>
                      </div>
                    </div>
                  </div>
                </div>
                <br>
                _______________________________________________<br>
                AusNOG mailing list<br>
                <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
                <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
                <br>
              </blockquote>
            </div>
          </div>
          <br>
          <fieldset></fieldset>
          <br>
          <pre>_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
        </blockquote>
        <br>
        <br>
        <pre>_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
      </blockquote>
      <br>
      <fieldset></fieldset>
      <br>
      <pre>_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
    <br>
  </div></div></div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br></div>