<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">Replies to list, please. Experiences
about which providers <i>don't</i> pair well together would also
be good. <span class="moz-smiley-s1"><span> :-) </span></span><br>
<br>
On 11/01/2013 06:19 AM, James Mcintosh wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:1383250793.22302.YahooMailNeo@web124905.mail.ne1.yahoo.com"
type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Hi Noggers,
We're looking at adding a second transit provider for redundancy (and hopefully more-or-less even load balancing). I was wondering what transit providers people would recommend pairing together to get the most diverse set of routes. Obviously you don't want your two upstreams to have very similar routes and paths.
As a start I was thinking perhaps a Gang of Four provider plus a non-Go4 provider would make a good pairing but I'd really appreciate the comments of some of the more experienced BGP gurus on the list.
</pre>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>