<html><head><meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"></head><body dir="auto"><div>Where did i say that? I don't think you'll be able to quote me as saying we should completely privatize education because I didn't say that. Not said, not alluded to and not implied.<br><br>It wouldn't even be possible without causing some kids to go without education.</div><div><br></div><div>Conversely, what you're arguing, by supporting the current legislative telecoms prohibition, if used in the educational analogy, would be to ban the development of any new private schools.</div><div><br></div><div>Would you support that argument Shane?</div><div><br></div><div>By the way, personally I'm a big supporter of an NBN in the regional and remote areas which are currently underserviced and always have been.</div><div><br></div><div>Having said that, you don't need to spend the $90 billion touted to overbuild a dozen existing networks in the city in order to effectively institute a new tax!</div><div><br></div><div>It's just not true!</div><div><br></div><div>And besides, they already charge a specific tax to subsidise telecoms in the bush .. it's called the USO.</div><div><br></div><div>TPG is currently forced to pay that tax for the privilege of selling services in the city ... only wait .. they're prohibited by law from doing so!</div><div><br></div><div>What a convoluted mess!</div><div><br></div><div>I look forward to the ALP forcing the new Government into a double- dissolution by blocking any attempt the Gov makes to repeal the communistic legislation referred to.</div><div><br></div><div><br><div><br></div></div><div><br>On 17/09/2013, at 8:27 PM, "Shane Short" <<a href="mailto:shane@short.id.au">shane@short.id.au</a>> wrote:<br><br></div><blockquote type="cite"><div>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
<br>
Paul Wallace wrote:
<blockquote cite="mid:9CED2FE5B5A0CD43BF197BB30440EB0B10AA632E59@DC01.polyfone.local" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">The whole thing is so fundamentally hypocritical it takes my breath away.
Take education for example ...
Today the tax payers of Australia continue to face further & further costs to build new schools to educate our kids.
Fortunately Private schools discovered a business for themselves case despite the competition offering FREE education.
This is so attractive to the tax payers of Australia that today, tax payers part funds private schools. That's a lot LESS expensive than the alternative which would obviously be forced to 100% fund that education.
</pre>
</blockquote>
So you're saying we should completely privatise the schools? What about
people who can't afford to spend many thousands of dollars a year
putting their children through private schools? Why should we pay for
them?<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:9CED2FE5B5A0CD43BF197BB30440EB0B10AA632E59@DC01.polyfone.local" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">Over to telecoms ...
The Government wishes to build the NBN to resolve the capacity deficiencies.
TPG offers on better than in the case of the private schools example & asks for ZERO financial assistance, the effect of which is to save the taxpayers a fortunate.
The argument that you need to then build an NBN to every single household in the country (at the cost of $37 billion) just so they can raise funds to then use to fund the subsidization of the services in the bush is, with respect, utterly devoid of any logic!
E.G. why not just keep the $37billion & impose a new tax to the same value instead? </pre>
</blockquote>
I think you're missing the point here. TPG is cherry-picking the markets
that will give it the best economic return. If everyone's allowed to
cherry pick the 'easy' markets, you're going to be left with an
incumbent or government entity which has to shell out substantially more
expense per port to service-- making either the cost to the end user
rediculously high-- or the the company itself won't make any money. The
entire business model of Telco-- from oversubscription (think cap plans
etc). to line rental; is that you make enough fat on some clients to
cover the cost of providing to the customers you make less on. If you
take the fat out, there's no sustainable business model here.<br>
<br>
<blockquote cite="mid:9CED2FE5B5A0CD43BF197BB30440EB0B10AA632E59@DC01.polyfone.local" type="cite">
<pre wrap="">
-----Original Message-----
From: AusNOG [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net">mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net</a>] On Behalf Of Jake Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 6:54 PM
To: Tom Lanyon
Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ausnog@lists.ausnog.net">ausnog@lists.ausnog.net</a>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Screw the NBN, says TPG: We'll do our own FTTB
On 17/09/13 18:47, Tom Lanyon wrote:
</pre>
</blockquote>
<blockquote cite="mid:9CED2FE5B5A0CD43BF197BB30440EB0B10AA632E59@DC01.polyfone.local" type="cite">
<blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">On 17/09/2013, at 6:09 PM, Jake Anderson <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:yahoo@vapourforge.com"><yahoo@vapourforge.com></a> wrote:
</pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">On 17/09/2013, at 5:14 PM, Nick Gale <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:nickgale@gmail.com"><nickgale@gmail.com></a> wrote:
</pre><blockquote type="cite"><pre wrap="">Are you saying we should have the ability for NBN competitors? If so why?
</pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">Because if you don't then private enterprise will build a bunch of little fiefdoms where it will be uneconomical for anybody else to try to take market share with diminishing returns, and as a bonus all those areas in "the bush" that the population as a whole is rather fond of won't get any services at all because its not "economic" to do so.
</pre></blockquote><pre wrap="">None of which would be an issue, assuming that this is all occurring in parallel to the NBN, right?
</pre></blockquote>
<pre wrap=""><!---->It means private networks would undercut the NBN for price in the "profitable" areas making the NBN which is meant to span the whole country not viable.
How the coalition plans to solve this one has yet to be explained.
IE
NBNco now buys the copper off telstra for X $Bn, Telstra uses that money to drop fibre in the "profitable" areas, sells fibre services cheaper than NBNco can sell vdsl as NBNco is expected to support your aunt in the country and copper costs more to maintain anyway.
NBNco goes bankrupt, gets sold back to Telstra for cents in the dollar.
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</div></blockquote><blockquote type="cite"><div><span>_______________________________________________</span><br><span>AusNOG mailing list</span><br><span><a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a></span><br><span><a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a></span><br></div></blockquote></body></html>