<p dir="ltr">What's your rant about SDN?</p>
<div class="gmail_quote">On 22/08/2013 8:14 PM, "Paul Gear" <<a href="mailto:ausnog@libertysys.com.au">ausnog@libertysys.com.au</a>> wrote:<br type="attribution"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">

  
    
  
  <div text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
    <div>It's all right, because PKI is going to
      save us!  Never mind that the SSL CAs can't get it right - the
      RIRs and network engineers will.<br>
      <br>
<a href="http://packetpushers.net/show-105-bgp-origin-validation-with-resource-public-key-infrastructure-rpki/" target="_blank">http://packetpushers.net/show-105-bgp-origin-validation-with-resource-public-key-infrastructure-rpki/</a><br>

<a href="http://packetpushers.net/pq-show-30-rpki-dnsec-and-internet-security-with-ivan-pepelnjak/" target="_blank">http://packetpushers.net/pq-show-30-rpki-dnsec-and-internet-security-with-ivan-pepelnjak/</a><br>
      (And the links contained therein.)<br>
      <br>
      Apologies for the ranty tone.  I'm almost as enthusiastic about
      RPKI as I am about SDN.<br>
      <br>
      Paul<br>
      <br>
      On 08/22/2013 06:39 PM, Joshua D'Alton wrote:<br>
    </div>
    <blockquote type="cite">
      
      <div dir="ltr">With all these /48s flying around being announced
        by various people, who/what is controlling legit announcing?
        Unless I'm missing something RADB doesn't seem anywhere near as
        up to date (well done Mark for keeping Internodes' up to date).?</div>
      <div class="gmail_extra"><br>
        <br>
        <div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 5:44 PM, Mark
          Newton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:newton@atdot.dotat.org" target="_blank">newton@atdot.dotat.org</a>></span>
          wrote:<br>
          <blockquote class="gmail_quote">
            <div><br>
              On Aug 22, 2013, at 2:26 PM, Sean K. Finn <<a href="mailto:sean.finn@ozservers.com.au" target="_blank">sean.finn@ozservers.com.au</a>>
              wrote:<br>
              ><br>
              > So I guess the general consensus is that we’re going
              to take IPv6 seriously in this country after all?<br>
              <br>
            </div>
            I thought we already were.<br>
            <br>
            To anyone who wants to dip their toe in the water:  SAGE-AU
            is just getting started with<br>
            a scheme whereby they'll provide an LOA for a /48 assignment
            out of 2406:c500::/32 to<br>
            each and every member, so they can announce it as they see
            fit.<br>
            <br>
            /48's are likely to be accepted more or less everywhere.  If
            you're a network operator and<br>
            you're not accepting them, have a good hard look at yourself
            and ask why.<br>
            ...</blockquote>
        </div>
      </div>
    </blockquote>
  </div>

<br>_______________________________________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div>