<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 22/05/2013 8:06 AM, Noel Butler
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote cite="mid:1369174010.4055.23.camel@tardis" type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="GENERATOR" content="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
<br>
<br>
At less than 1% global IPv6 utilisation I can understand why
no-ones too interested, likely playing the wait and see game.<br>
</blockquote>
Thats 1% of end-user connections. You would expect a far greater
utilisation rate amongst ISPs network operations, offices and
servers, given their corporate and server traffic isn't blocked by
the lack of IPv6 support on residential access networks or
consumer-grade CPE.<br>
<br>
Remember this thread started from an observation that many
organisations were shifting over to IPv6 for mail transport, almost
despite themselves.<br>
In Australia, 20% of ASNs announce IPv6 connectivity -
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://v6asns.ripe.net/v/6?s=_ALL;s=AU">http://v6asns.ripe.net/v/6?s=_ALL;s=AU</a><br>
<br>
You would expect the greatest shift to IPv6 transport would be with
email, with the majority of traffic being from one ISP's server to
another ISP server, and ISPs are supposed to be driving this bus. <br>
Out of curiosity, for those with IPv6-enabled MX hosts - what
proportion of email volume are ISPs seeing sent out or arriving via
IPv6 from outside Internet sources? (that is, not directly to/from
customers) <br>
<br>
P.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>