Shouldn't, but just look at TPB. MAFIAA started going after 3 levels above the end customer :/ Nasty business this is.<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:18 PM, Skeeve Stevens <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:skeeve+ausnog@eintellegonetworks.com" target="_blank">skeeve+ausnog@eintellegonetworks.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div dir="ltr">Transit providers should not block ANYTHING when the feeds are going further downstream. IMHO.</div><div class="gmail_extra">
<br clear="all"><div><div><br>...Skeeve</div><div><br></div><div><div><b style="font-size:13px;font-family:Calibri">Skeeve Stevens - </b><span style="font-size:13px;font-family:Calibri">eintellego Networks Pty Ltd</span></div>
<div><div><span style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:13px"><a href="mailto:skeeve@eintellegonetworks.com" target="_blank">skeeve@eintellegonetworks.com</a> ; <a href="http://www.eintellegonetworks.com/" target="_blank">www.eintellegonetworks.com</a></span><font><p style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:13px;margin:0px">
Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell <a href="tel:%2B61%20%280%29414%20753%20383" value="+61414753383" target="_blank">+61 (0)414 753 383</a> ; <a>skype://skeeve</a></p><p style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:13px;margin:0px"><a href="http://facebook.com/eintellegonetworks" target="_blank">facebook.com/eintellegonetworks</a> ; <a href="http://twitter.com/networkceoau" target="_blank"></a><a href="http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve" target="_blank">linkedin.com/in/skeeve</a> </p>
<p style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:13px;margin:0px"><a href="http://twitter.com/networkceoau" target="_blank">twitter.com/networkceoau</a> ; blog: <a href="http://www.network-ceo.net/" target="_blank">www.network-ceo.net</a></p>
<p style="font-family:Calibri;font-size:13px;margin:0px"><img><br></p><p style="margin:0px"><span style="color:rgb(127,0,127);font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:13px">The Experts Who The Experts Call</span></p>
</font></div><div style="font-family:Calibri,sans-serif;font-size:14px;color:rgb(127,0,127)"><span style="color:rgb(0,32,96);font-size:13px">Juniper - Cisco </span><span style="color:rgb(0,32,96);font-size:13px">- Cloud</span></div>
</div></div></div><div><div class="h5">
<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Matt Perkins <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:matt@spectrum.com.au" target="_blank">matt@spectrum.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
AAPT are providing transit. You would think that they would not block anything on transit. (Im not sure even the proposed /nolonger Conroy filter proposed anything but retail stuff. )<br>
Then a gain a trace through AAPT from us goes dead at the border.<br>
<br>
Matt.<br>
<br>
On 11/04/13 4:45 PM, Tim March wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
On 11/04/13 4:36 PM, Danny O'Brien wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
It's more the "why" I'm looking for than the "how" at this point. If anyone is blackholing the site for operational reasons I figured that they would pipe up here.<br>
<br>
There was a suggestion that if it was a government demand, it might be through a similar process to this story: <a href="https://www.computerworld.com.au/article/457042/asic_blocks_global_capital_wealth_websites_/" target="_blank">https://www.computerworld.com.<u></u>au/article/457042/asic_blocks_<u></u>global_capital_wealth_<u></u>websites_/</a><br>
<br>
Does ASIC use a legal process to require ISPs to block certain domains, or is this part of the voluntary blacklist?<br>
<br>
I mailed Robert Tozer earlier today, but haven't had a reply yet.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
This.<br>
<br>
As Mark alluded to, according to <a href="http://sameid.net" target="_blank">sameid.net</a> there are ~ 1200 domains delegated to that IP address. It's public knowledge that some carriers are implementing a voluntary blacklist. If that blacklist implementation is responsible for arbitrarily blocking access to literally thousands of sites at a time (which may or may not be the case... I'm pretty keen to hear what AAPT has to say.) that's an issue.<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
T.<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<br>
-- <br>
/* Matt Perkins<br>
Direct 1300 137 379 Spectrum Networks Ptd. Ltd.<br>
Office 1300 133 299 <a href="mailto:matt@spectrum.com.au" target="_blank">matt@spectrum.com.au</a><br>
Fax 1300 133 255 Level 6, 350 George Street Sydney 2000<br>
SIP <a href="mailto:1300137379@sip.spectrum.com.au" target="_blank">1300137379@sip.spectrum.com.au</a><br>
PGP/GNUPG Public Key can be found at <a href="http://pgp.mit.edu" target="_blank">http://pgp.mit.edu</a><br>
*/<br>
<br>
______________________________<u></u>_________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net" target="_blank">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/<u></u>mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
</blockquote></div><br></div></div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>