<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 03/03/2013 05:52 PM, Skeeve Stevens
wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAEUfUGPKhH7O_dKEv-mOOYMhF-5XXAigiS+1Oa72UUP1r50dcg@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=ISO-8859-1">
<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
<div>
<div> The other thing i think would help in relation to this
would be eliminating (or dramatically reducing) the
associate membership fee for IPv6-only allocations. This
would put usable IPv6 allocations within the reach of any
organisation in any of the economies that APNIC serves.<br>
<br>
I don't know where the appropriate place to raise this
issue is, but i would really like to see it considered.<br>
<br>
Regards,<br>
Paul<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<div><br>
</div>
<div><br>
</div>
<div>And as the rate of IPv6 adoption increases, so do the funds
that let APNIC actually operate and function dry up? I don't
think so. APNIC provide a VERY valuable service and I'd like
to see them around in 10 years time.<br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
I wasn't suggesting that it remain that way forever...<br>
<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>