<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body text="#000000" bgcolor="#FFFFFF">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix"><font size="-1"><font face="Arial">Increasing
<font size="-1">pricing on IPv<font size="-1">4 alon<font
size="-1">e</font> is only going to price people out of
t<font size="-1">h<font size="-1">e market. </font></font></font></font></font></font><br>
<br>
<font size="-1">It wou<font size="-1">ld <font size="-1">be much
more ef<font size="-1">fe<font size="-1">ctive if each
registry imposed</font></font></font></font><font
face="Arial"><font size="-1"> a <font size="-1">fee </font>on
each IP address that is not running in a globally routable
dual-stack configuration.<br>
<font size="-1">(i.e with an IPv6 counterpart)<br>
<font size="-1">Make that fee extreme and you can just sit
back and watch the <font size="-1">economic forces
solve the <font size="-1">mi<font size="-1">gration
issue overnight.<br>
<font size="-1">Of course, as has been m<font
size="-1">entioned, orga<font size="-1">nisations
like APNIC are run by their members and no
member would <font size="-1">ever <font
size="-1">vote for such a thing.<br>
<br>
This brings us back at square one, with
limited <font size="-1">incentive to
roll out <font size="-1">IPv<font
size="-1">6 other than a distant
pipe dream that someday, somehow,
it will make our live<font
size="-1">s easier.<font
size="-1"><br>
<br>
<font size="-1">Martin</font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font></font>
</div>
<br>
</body>
</html>