<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN">
<html><body>
<p>Correct, but if you have two upstreams and a full international from each.....</p>
<p>On Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:46:55 +1100, Brad Evans wrote:</p>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%"><!-- html ignored --><!-- head ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->VS-S720-10G-3CXL and WS-SUP720-3BXL will do 1m IPv4 routes. I think you'll find 500k is the limit for IPv6 routing table.<br /><br /> -Brad<br /><br />
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 12/02/2013 11:37 AM, Randil Wijerathne wrote:</div>
<blockquote type="cite" style="padding-left:5px; border-left:#1010ff 2px solid; margin-left:5px; width:100%"><!-- meta ignored --><!-- meta ignored -->
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: #1f497d;">No Cisco 6500 is not good option If you want to run BGP with transit ISP. Maximum IPv4 routes by a VS-S720-10G-3CXL* supervisor is 500K. internet routing table already ~ 435k <!-- o ignored --></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: #1f497d;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: #1f497d;">Best Regards,<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: #1f497d;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;">Randil Wijerathne<!-- o ignored --></span></strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;">Network Engineer<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;">AusRegistry Pty Ltd<br /> Level 8, 10 Queens Road,<br /> Melbourne. Victoria. Australia. 3004.<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;">Ph: +61 3 9866 3710<br /> Fax: +61 3 9866 1970<br /> Email: <a href="mailto:randil.wijerathne@ausregistry.com.au">randil.wijerathne@ausregistry.com.au</a><!-- o ignored --></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: black;">Web: <a title="blocked::http://www.ausregistry.com.au/
http://www.ausregistry.com.au/">www.ausregistry.com.au</a><!-- o ignored --></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.0pt; color: black;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 8.0pt; color: #0f243e;">The information contained in this communication is intended for the named recipients only. It is subject to copyright and may contain legally privileged and confidential information and if you are not an intended recipient you must not use, copy, distribute or take any action in reliance on it. If you have received this communication in error, please delete all copies from your system and notify us immediately.</span><span style="font-size: 8.0pt; color: black;"><!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 11.0pt; color: #1f497d;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
<div>
<div style="border: none; padding: 3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm;">
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;">From:</span></strong><span style="font-size: 10.0pt;"> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net">ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net</a> [<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net">mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net</a>] <strong>On Behalf Of </strong>David Hughes<br /><strong>Sent:</strong> Tuesday, 12 February 2013 11:34 AM<br /><strong>To:</strong> Ankit Agrawal<br /><strong>Cc:</strong> <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ausnog@ausnog.net">ausnog@ausnog.net</a><br /><strong>Subject:</strong> Re: [AusNOG] powerful routers in core/edge routing/switching<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!-- o ignored --> </p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!-- o ignored --> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!-- o ignored --> </p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">If you are looking for density of sub-10GbE ports and just BGP / OSPF then Cat6K is still a fair option if you want switching and routing. If you want 10GbE ports then Nexus should also be on your review list too.<!-- o ignored --></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!-- o ignored --> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!-- o ignored --> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">David<!-- o ignored --></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">…<!-- o ignored --></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!-- o ignored --> </p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!-- o ignored --> </p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On 12/02/2013, at 10:27 AM, Ankit Agrawal <<a href="mailto:ankitagrawals@gmail.com">ankitagrawals@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<!-- o ignored --></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br /><br /><!-- o ignored --></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">Hi Guys,<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">I am interesting in hearing what others think and/or have experienced about the following:<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">Cisco ASR<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">Juniper MX<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">Brocade MLX<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">I am after some powerful routers (with possible switching) that can hold multiple IPv4/IPv6 tables and forward say ~200 Gbps of throughput preferably all in hardware. This will be pure BGP/OSPF calculations for next hops, route convergence and forwarding. I know MLX ports can act as switching ports so that will mean I don't need a separate switching layer which is a bonus. <!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">Guess, instead of having a L3 switch that can do routing, I want a router that can do switching.<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">Looking forward to hear from you noggers.<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">Best Regards,<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;">Ankit Agrawal.<!-- o ignored --></span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10.5pt;"><!-- o ignored --> </span></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal">_______________________________________________<br /> AusNOG mailing list<br /><a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br /><a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><!-- o ignored --></p>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><!-- o ignored --> </p>
</div>
</div>
<br /><fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset><br />
<pre>_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<p> </p>
<div> </div>
</body></html>