<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">I would really love to know how these
UTM devices think they can do this securely, given the appalling
level of proxy support in Mac, iOS, and Android apps. Or is their
certificate validation so poor that they just don't care that
they're being MitM-ed?<br>
<br>
Paul<br>
<br>
On 10/26/2012 03:34 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAEUfUGO_v7gTOX+rKYMT6JucGEm6cJkV_uB2U-bsP1arGi1zGA@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Context-Type" content="text/html;
charset=windows-1252">
You could use something like a Juniper SRX with web control UTM...
or the many other products out there.<br>
</blockquote>
<br>
<div class="moz-cite-prefix">On 10/26/2012 03:40 PM, Christopher
Pollock wrote:<br>
</div>
<blockquote
cite="mid:CAK6biYj3GhiaJBq6yviWGgD7Wv7ghWgMvv-WYKHqtyTgpsbHTQ@mail.gmail.com"
type="cite">Palo Alto Networks kit is supposedly very good at
nailing down that stuff. Last I checked they could specifically
block different functions of facebook (chat, adding photos, etc).
Looks pretty neat, although I haven't used it yet.
<div>
...<br>
<br>
<br>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 3:31 PM, Graeme
Allen <span dir="ltr"><<a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="mailto:gallen@mytelecom.com.au" target="_blank">gallen@mytelecom.com.au</a>></span>
wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote">
On this topic, what are you going to use to restrict access
to just<br>
Facebook (given that using IP addresses to pin "Facebook"
down is pretty<br>
useless)?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb">
<div class="h5"><br>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
</div>
</div>
</blockquote>
<br>
</body>
</html>