<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.28.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 18:27 +0800, Brad Peczka wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
Who have, thus far, proven themselves to be quite resourceful.
Underestimating Anonymous is only for those who are keen to experience an RGE. For everyone else, it's just another reminder to check your security.
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
<BR>
Indeed, 10-15 years ago they'd be dismissed as typical scriddies, but today, it is safe to assume there are some "bandwagon" jumpers who wouldn't even cut the grade of a scriddie, but the masses would probably include highly intelligent people in their ranks. Anonymous are Anonymous, and in being Anonymous, their legion of supporters may even include some on the staff of organisations here, maybe even on this list who you have conversed with often and regard as a peer, you just never know.<BR>
<BR>
</BODY>
</HTML>