<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 4:17 PM, Mark Newton <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:newton@internode.com.au">newton@internode.com.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div style="word-wrap:break-word"><div><div class="im"><div>More bandwidth means more spectrum required to achieve the desired</div></div></div>
<div>bitrate, which means we carve our spectrum up into larger chunks, which</div>
<div>means we need the same amount of it for the same number of Mbps </div>
<div>regardless of how much "RF air time" (yeesh) we use.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Or you do as we have done to get to where we are and improve the technologies relating to modulation and get a higher bitrate per hz.</div>
<div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div>Shannon Hartley Theorem is your friend.</div></div></blockquote><div><br></div><div>More of an enemy, but certainly not really relevant when talking about wireless performance figures on the market in Oz today as we're not at the limit yet in either bitrate per Hz of channel bandwidth or sheer quantity of spectrum available for more channels.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Once <u>LTE is deployed AND we have run out of spectrum</u> (which is a hell of a long way off with multiples of NextG spectrum being released by the govt in the coming years) then you might consider we're up against Shannon's limit. Even then LTE-Advanced starts proposes a lot of architectural changes that will get us further and beyond that who knows. </div>
<div><br></div><div>Even if the modulation technologies stayed where NextG is today but they just chopped up and sold 700Mhz - we would have insanely competitive and cheap wireless in place well before the NBN is complete.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Most people on this list argue that wireless is shared = fail = we need NBN. 50K new users on NextG a month would argue differently and (cellular) wireless is more relevant in terms of sheer number of use cases in the post PC world we're heading toward anyway.</div>
<div><br></div><div><div>My thesis is that this is good enough for a vast majority of non-technical end users of the Internet and undermines the business case for the NBN. </div><div><br></div></div><div>David.</div><div>
<br></div></div>-- <br><b>David Connors</b><font color="#C0C0C0"> </font><font color="#999999">| </font><a href="mailto:david@codify.com" target="_blank"><font color="#999999">david@codify.com</font></a><font color="#999999"> | </font><a href="http://www.codify.com" target="_blank"><font color="#999999">www.codify.com</font></a><br>
Software Engineer<br>Codify Pty Ltd<br>Phone: +61 (7) 3210 6268 | Facsimile: +61 (7) 3210 6269 | Mobile: +61 417 189 363<br>V-Card: <a href="https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors" target="_blank"><font color="#666666">https://www.codify.com/cards/davidconnors</font></a><br>
Address Info: <a href="https://www.codify.com/contact" target="_blank"><font color="#666666">https://www.codify.com/contact<span></span><span></span></font></a><br><br>