<html><head></head><body style="word-wrap: break-word; -webkit-nbsp-mode: space; -webkit-line-break: after-white-space; ">Hi,<div><br></div><div>We've had the same problem and have had to settle for Annex-A in order to get 3G backup in the same unit.</div><div><br></div><div>While the AP1252 may be similar, the processor speed (400MHz vs. 533 on the 1252) and radio performance of the AP801 (in the 880 series) seems to be noticeably different (less than) than the AP1252.</div><div><br></div><div>Tristan</div><div><br><div><div>On 17/03/2011, at 10:35 PM, Glenn Powell wrote:</div><br class="Apple-interchange-newline"><blockquote type="cite">
<div>
Lets hope Cisco sort out the 887 supply issues in the distie channel. It seems impossible to buy an 887 with Annex M & Wifi with the right regulatory domain. Not to mention 4 weeks lead time on supply......<br>
<br>
<br>
Feedback from Cisco Sales Support here in Aus as to why there is no CISCO887MW-GN-A-K9 available for purchase.<br>
----<br>
<i>802.11gn APs use AP1252G as the reference. The AP on the 880 platforms is essentially an AP1252G. A SKU should be used for Australia according to this.</i><br>
<br>
<i>However, there’s no A SKU for the 887MW. We have not seen much annex M requirement from Australia hence there’s no WLAN version for this.</i><br>
<br>
<i>So, there is NO 887MW SKU for Australia. CISCO887MW-GN-E-K9 should be removed from Australia Price List.</i><br>
----<br>
<br>
So either Cisco sales support have bad info, or the IOS sets the correct regulatory domain, OR a few corporate customers have non compliant Wifi. Hopefully it sorts itself out.<br>
<br>
Glenn.<br>
<br>
<br>
-----Original Message-----<br>
<br>
Don't bet everything on the newer model just yet. There are still hundreds of the old model in stock at distributors, but only dozens of its replacement.
<br>
<br>
John
<br>
<br>
<br>
On 17/03/2011, at 1:03 PM, Skeeve Stevens wrote:
<br>
<blockquote type="CITE">
Just an FYI as these are used in large volumes by many on these lists.
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE" style="position: static; z-index: auto; ">
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
The Cisco 867 has been EOS/L'd – recommended replacement is 887 router - <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/eol_c51_638188.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/eol_c51_638188.html</a>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE" style="position: static; z-index: auto; ">
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
The Cisco 877 has also been EOS/L'd – recommended replacement is 887 router - <a href="http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/eol_c51_638144.html">http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps380/eol_c51_638144.html</a>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
Both on December 20, 2011.
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
Looks like they've dumped their middle, less featured router ranges.
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
...Skeeve
</blockquote>
<blockquote type="CITE">
<br>
<br>
<br>
</blockquote>
<pre>_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
<br>
</div>
_______________________________________________<br>AusNOG mailing list<br><a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog<br></blockquote></div><br></div></body></html>