<div>That's awesome Bevan.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Anyone from iinet or other ISP from the west want to do the same? Maybe IIA could also hold said debrief.</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Peter Tiggerdine.<br><br></div>
<div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 6:10 AM, Bevan Slattery <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Bevan.Slattery@nextdc.com">Bevan.Slattery@nextdc.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote style="BORDER-LEFT: #ccc 1px solid; MARGIN: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex; PADDING-LEFT: 1ex" class="gmail_quote">Agree entirely David. NEXTDC is happy to arrange and fund an industry debrief on the judgement along with focus on Safe Harbour. We'll see if we can do one in each east coast city.<br>
<br>B<br><br>Sent from my iPhone<br>
<div>
<div></div>
<div class="h5"><br>On 24/02/2011, at 4:07 PM, "David Hughes" <<a href="mailto:David@Hughes.com.au">David@Hughes.com.au</a>> wrote:<br><br>><br>><br>> Exactly, hence the content of my email. Congrat's to iiNet for this result but the wording of the judgement raises other questions that the industry should consider.<br>
><br>><br>> David<br>> ...<br>><br>> On 24/02/2011, at 2:56 PM, Peter Tiggerdine wrote:<br>><br>>> I'd call this commiserations. Two of the chief justices sided with AFACT and<br>>> the findings seem to suggest that relying on current legislation is on<br>
>> borrowed time. Nothing more. Common-sense would have being to throw it out<br>>> before it got the full bench of the high court.<br>>><br>>> iiNet have done well, but our industry as a whole will need to revisit the<br>
>> issue in the no too distant future and come up with a new plan to mitigate<br>>> the legal risks. apprently offering legal methods isn't going to stop the<br>>> next ISP from being sued.<br>>> AFACT still have a right of appeal to the high court in Canberra. This waste<br>
>> of public money is long from over.<br>>><br>>> Regards,<br>>><br>>> Peter Tiggerdine.<br>>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:14 PM, David Hughes <<a href="mailto:david@hughes.com.au">david@hughes.com.au</a>> wrote:<br>
>><br>>>><br>>>><br>>>> <a href="http://www.itnews.com.au/News/249187,breaking-iinet-victorious-as-film-industry-appeal-dismissed.aspx" target="_blank">http://www.itnews.com.au/News/249187,breaking-iinet-victorious-as-film-industry-appeal-dismissed.aspx</a><br>
>>><br>>>> Congratulations to all involved. Chalk one up for common senses, although<br>>>> some of the language used in the judgement is a little concerning.<br>>>><br>>>><br>
>>> David<br>>>> ...<br>>>> _______________________________________________<br>>>> AusNOG mailing list<br>>>> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
>>> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>>>><br>>> _______________________________________________<br>>> AusNOG mailing list<br>
>> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>>> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>> AusNOG mailing list<br>> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
</div></div>The information contained in this email and any attachments may be confidential. This email and any attachments are also subject to copyright. No part of them may be reproduced, adapted or transmitted without the written permission of the copyright owner. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this information is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately advise the sender by return email and delete the message from your system. All email communications to and from NEXTDC Limited are recorded for the purposes of archival and storage.<br>
</blockquote></div><br>