That's awesome Stefan, I was looking for some actual data shortly after the election - I'm assuming the counting hadn't finished when I was looking.<br><br>It would be interesting to compare the graphs from the previous election... I doubt prior to the 2010 election Conroy would have had such specific votes against. <br>
<br>Matt. <br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:50 PM, Stefan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:stefan@stefan.id.au">stefan@stefan.id.au</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); padding-left: 1ex;">
Re Conroy's vote distribution, I'm not sure this was linked around here,<br>
so see<br>
<a href="http://www.zdnet.com.au/did-anti-filter-voters-put-conroy-last-339306192.htm" target="_blank">http://www.zdnet.com.au/did-anti-filter-voters-put-conroy-last-339306192.htm</a><br>
and the source content<br>
<a href="http://pento.net/2010/09/21/conroy-and-fielding-the-battle-for-last-place/" target="_blank">http://pento.net/2010/09/21/conroy-and-fielding-the-battle-for-last-place/</a><br>
<br>
Basically, you can see two large spikes at preferences #2 and #8 for him<br>
on the Labor and Greens tickets respectively, and a half size spike at<br>
#59 for those that specifically placed him last. Unfortunately said<br>
spike at #59 while visible on the graph, was only 5.2% of voters, so no<br>
way near enough to be of any risk to his seat :(<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Stefan<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
On 6/10/2010 1:49 PM, Kai wrote:<br>
> Guess not enough people voted below the line? having that, even if enough DID vote below the line, Gillard still allowed Conroy to retain his position.<br>
><br>
> ----- Original Message -----<br>
> From: "Phil Pierotti"<<a href="mailto:phil.pierotti@platformnetworks.net">phil.pierotti@platformnetworks.net</a>><br>
> To: "ausnog"<<a href="mailto:ausnog@ausnog.net">ausnog@ausnog.net</a>><br>
> Sent: Wednesday, 6 October, 2010 9:21:06 AM GMT +09:30 Darwin<br>
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Ans So It Begins<br>
><br>
> <quote>.... and I'll see you at the next election ....</quote><br>
><br>
> Didn't we just *have* an election? And what exactly changed?<br>
><br>
> Regards,<br>
><br>
> Phil Pierotti<br>
> Network Operations Manager<br>
> Platform Networks<br>
> <a href="http://www.platformnetworks.net" target="_blank">www.platformnetworks.net</a><br>
> ph. 1300 854 678<br>
><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> AusNOG mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
> _______________________________________________<br>
> AusNOG mailing list<br>
> <a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
> <a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
><br>
<br>
_______________________________________________<br>
AusNOG mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a><br>
<a href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog" target="_blank">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>