<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
  <head>
    <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
      http-equiv="Content-Type">
  </head>
  <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
    <font size="-1"><font face="Trebuchet MS">Hear hear!  Whomever
        claims PMG "plan" works today should be shot.<br>
        <br>
      </font></font><br>
    On 12/08/2010 7:20 PM, Curtis Bayne wrote:
    <blockquote
      cite="mid:FA0CD0970E4B7F439846F7C7670841C9049CC3@bnehnex1.SONET.local"
      type="cite">
      <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html;
        charset=ISO-8859-1">
      <meta name="Generator" content="MS Exchange Server version
        6.5.7638.1">
      <title>RE: [AusNOG] background radiation was: "i want a
        pony!"(wasRe:Longlive the NBN. The NBN is dead?! [personal])</title>
      <!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
      <p><font size="2">Wait. I'm confused. We're using the construction
          and subsequent sale of PMG (now Telstra) as the definition of
          success of a state-owned telco monopoly, whilst on the other
          hand, a consortium of providers are complaining about
          anti-competitive practices?<br>
          <br>
          <a moz-do-not-send="true"
href="http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/354465/bigpond_price_cuts_anger_internode_iinet/">http://www.pcworld.idg.com.au/article/354465/bigpond_price_cuts_anger_internode_iinet/</a><br>
          <br>
          What's to say that once independent infrastructure is
          eliminated that the same practices won't emerge (especially if
          the new shareholders of the NBN have a vested interest in the
          telecommunications industry)...<br>
          <br>
          <br>
          -----Original Message-----<br>
          From: Matthew Moyle-Croft [<a moz-do-not-send="true"
            href="mailto:mmc@internode.com.au">mailto:mmc@internode.com.au</a>]<br>
          Sent: Thu 8/12/2010 6:42 PM<br>
          To: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:roland@chan.id.au">roland@chan.id.au</a><br>
          Cc: <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net">ausnog-bounces@lists.ausnog.net</a>; Curtis Bayne;
          <a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:ausnog@ausnog.net">ausnog@ausnog.net</a><br>
          Subject: Re: [AusNOG] background radiation was: "i want a
          pony!"(wasRe:Longlive the NBN. The NBN is dead?! [personal])<br>
          <br>
          Brilliant Roland.<br>
          <br>
          PMG built the PSTN with regulatory certainty for more than 80
          years.   Money was invested and built out for the good of all,
          then it was sold off.<br>
          <br>
          So, the Government is just following a proven business model. <br>
          <br>
          What's not to like?<br>
          <br>
          MMC<br>
          <br>
          On 12/08/2010, at 5:22 PM, <a class="moz-txt-link-rfc2396E" href="mailto:roland@chan.id.au"><roland@chan.id.au></a> wrote:<br>
          <br>
          > Who built the PSTN? Who paid for it? Did they get a fair
          return from decades of line rental  and the eventual sale of
          Telstra?<br>
          ><br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
          <br>
        </font>
      </p>
      <pre wrap="">
<fieldset class="mimeAttachmentHeader"></fieldset>
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<a class="moz-txt-link-abbreviated" href="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</a>
<a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</a>
</pre>
    </blockquote>
  </body>
</html>