<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
http-equiv="Content-Type">
<title></title>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
On 22/04/2010 4:00 PM, Curtis Bayne wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:FA0CD0970E4B7F439846F7C7670841C9049ABA@bnehnex1.SONET.local"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type"
content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
<meta name="Generator" content="MS Exchange Server version 6.5.7638.1">
<title>RE: [AusNOG] OT: Regulator rings the changes for telcos, isps
- WARNING, POTENTIAL FLAMEBAIT</title>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<p><font size="2">I agree entirely, and thank you for sharing your
opinion publicly. My personal opinion is that the OPEL project was a
pragmatic way to improve rural telecoms with minimal investment
(comparatively) without interfering with the complex and fragile
telecommunications industry.<br>
</font></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
First, I was expressing my opinion that what you described sounded like
Broadband Connect - not an opinion on Opel, or its desirability or
otherwise!<br>
<br>
But yes, I think the broad goals of bringing metro-equivalent backhaul
pricing to regional areas was a good way to go.<br>
<br>
<blockquote
cite="mid:FA0CD0970E4B7F439846F7C7670841C9049ABA@bnehnex1.SONET.local"
type="cite">
<p><font size="2"><br>
Had it not been scrapped by the government, the OPEL project would be
delivering tangible benefits to consumers TODAY. That boat has sailed
and what a shame. OPEL on a national scale would be the best of both
worlds. Layer 2/Layer 3: that's the job of the VAR. Want to build a
regional telehouse for DR? Easy. There's still a place for small,
regional ISPs (which appeals to the silo mentalities in regional areas
- no pun intended) as well as larger service providers with their
economy of scale. Everyone goes home happy.<br>
</font></p>
</blockquote>
<br>
I think the original plan expressed in the Broadband Connect project
was good - except they screwed up the conditions of the tender, and
would not allow a compliant bid to only address the backhaul component
- every bid had to include a local access component in addition to be
compliant, thereby destroying the main result.<br>
<br>
I'm not so convinced that the selection of Opel, and the way Opel chose
to deliver on the requirements,would have been the best way forward.
What they were planning on building was a national WiMAX network with
lots of towers on which Optus could coincidentally house 3G cellphone
transmitters, building a national private mobile tower network and
backhaul on the back of government funds designed for other purposes.
At least, thats how I read the commentary from others ;-)<br>
<br>
Anyway, thats ancient history now.<br>
<font size="2"><br>
</font>(Ob disclosure - I worked on a competing bid, that wasn't
selected to move forward. Still think it was a good idea :-) )<br>
<br>
P.<br>
<br>
</body>
</html>