<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 TRANSITIONAL//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV="Content-Type" CONTENT="text/html; CHARSET=UTF-8">
<META NAME="GENERATOR" CONTENT="GtkHTML/3.18.3">
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<BR>
1/ its not the way a good list is setup, despite your rantings.<BR>
<BR>
2/ it's trivial to setup, yes, its something many of us are accustomed to doing, that's putting in place unnecessary workarounds because of those who don't setup lists correctly, but even that seems much easier than to sort out your posting styles so you don't send the same message to the list twice :)<BR>
<BR>
look at the CC line already LOL<BR>
<BR>
<BR>
On Sat, 2009-08-08 at 19:27 +0930, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
<BLOCKQUOTE TYPE=CITE>
<PRE>
On Sat, 8 Aug 2009, Kym Kovan wrote:
> David Hughes wrote:
> > All
> >
> > Bevan and I have had a chat about this and we've decided to run the
> > list as reply-to-sender. The list has been reconfigured to reflect
> > that.
>
> Being that newbie I assume you are the moderator (note to self, read
> the sign-up help messages :-) ) so in that case is it correct form to
> just hit "Reply-to all" so that the poster gets two copies of the
> reply or is it a requirement to delete the original poster and just
> send to the list when you want your response to be a public one?
It is trivial to suppress duplicate emails.
It can be a feature, I file email from lists into various folders using
Sieve (Cyrus & Dovecot IMAP feature). If I am interacting with a thread
then replies to me go to both the folder (handy for archival purposes)
and to my inbox (handy so I reply to it sooner).
_______________________________________________
AusNOG mailing list
<A HREF="mailto:AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net">AusNOG@lists.ausnog.net</A>
<A HREF="http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog">http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog</A>
</PRE>
</BLOCKQUOTE>
</BODY>
</HTML>