<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
<meta content="text/html;charset=ISO-8859-1" http-equiv="Content-Type">
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
<br>
<br>
Skeeve Stevens wrote:
<blockquote
cite="mid:292AF25E62B8894C921B893B53A19D973944FD1D5A@BUSINESSEX.business.ad"
type="cite">
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; ">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 12 (filtered medium)">
<style>
<!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0cm;
margin-bottom:.0001pt;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:blue;
text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
{mso-style-priority:99;
color:purple;
text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
color:#002060;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;}
@page Section1
{size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.Section1
{page:Section1;}
-->
</style>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
<div class="Section1"><br>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="color: rgb(0, 32, 96);">There are
smaller hosting
companies out there (here in ANZ at least) that want to be on, hosting,
multi-homed, but only need a /24 or /23, but they’re given the minimum
allocation on a /22 – whether they need it or not.</span></p>
</div>
</blockquote>
A /22 is the same routing effort as a /24. So given that most are
unlikely to need much more than a /23 I don't think it'll make a
difference to the routing table size.<br>
<br>
In terms of using IPv4 up - given that I'm seeing ISPs with eyeballs
being allocated large slabs of space (and I mean many multiples of
/16s) the impact small hosting companies companies have as /22s or /24s
is pretty trivial I'd expect.<br>
<br>
Look at the CIDR reports - have a look at the aggregation possible with
some ISPs - clearly a few /24s vs /22s makes little difference in a
world where even a small bit of aggregation by the top 10 deagg people
would reduce the routing table size quite a bit.<br>
<br>
MMC<br>
</body>
</html>