From david at hughes.id Sun Feb 4 14:00:47 2024 From: david at hughes.id (david at hughes.id) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 13:00:47 +1000 Subject: [AusNOG] AusNOG 2024 sponsorship opportunities Message-ID: <14A9A5BC-A782-48E9-9DF0-EF593E321E15@hughes.id> Hi all, We're creating more opportunities for companies in our industry to promote themselves in conjunction with the AusNOG 2024 conference. If this is of interest to you, please sign up to our mailing list at the link below. We'll be sending out details about opportunities for AusNOG 2024 in the coming days. https://www.ausnog.net/lists/sponsorship Thanks David ... From hudrob at gmail.com Mon Feb 5 09:03:58 2024 From: hudrob at gmail.com (Robert Hudson) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:03:58 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Security contact at Internode/iiNet/TPG Message-ID: I've emailed abuse at intenode but it bounces with a content warning. There's a phishing and MFA issue that I suspect someone there should know about. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Ben.Ricardo at acs.com.au Mon Feb 5 09:27:33 2024 From: Ben.Ricardo at acs.com.au (Ben Ricardo) Date: Sun, 4 Feb 2024 22:27:33 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Contact for Commander M2 Vocus NOC Message-ID: <7abf4588f1ba48c099b5493c3f887e32@acs.com.au> Hey all, Just wondering if someone has the NOC contact details for Commander/M2/Vocus ? Just got a routing issue in their network that needs looking at. Cheers, Ben Ben Ricardo?| Senior Technician |? M Net&SysAdmin, MCITP-SA, CEHv8, ITIL Australian Computer Solutions Pty Ltd | 2/28 Barralong Rd Erina NSW 2250?| P: 02 4365 2727 or 1300-807-131 | F: 02 4365 2304 | E: ben.ricardo at acs.com.au Twitter: @austcompso From phil.mawson at gmail.com Mon Feb 5 09:30:30 2024 From: phil.mawson at gmail.com (Phil Mawson) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 09:30:30 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Contact for Commander M2 Vocus NOC In-Reply-To: <7abf4588f1ba48c099b5493c3f887e32@acs.com.au> References: <7abf4588f1ba48c099b5493c3f887e32@acs.com.au> Message-ID: <1ED5D100-2482-4739-A40F-BFC18FA236AC@gmail.com> Hi Ben, I?ve reached out directly off list. Cheers, Phil AS4826 > On 5 Feb 2024, at 9:27?am, Ben Ricardo wrote: > > Hey all, > Just wondering if someone has the NOC contact details for Commander/M2/Vocus ? > Just got a routing issue in their network that needs looking at. > > Cheers, > Ben > > > Ben Ricardo | Senior Technician | M Net&SysAdmin, MCITP-SA, CEHv8, ITIL > Australian Computer Solutions Pty Ltd | 2/28 Barralong Rd Erina NSW 2250 | > P: 02 4365 2727 or 1300-807-131 | F: 02 4365 2304 | E: ben.ricardo at acs.com.au > Twitter: @austcompso > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog From technical at halenet.com.au Mon Feb 5 17:51:46 2024 From: technical at halenet.com.au (Tim McCullagh) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 16:51:46 +1000 Subject: [AusNOG] Is anyone on ausnog from gmail References: <0581BCF6-E04C-4328-BA3E-EBB385B5E930@langshaw.id.au> Message-ID: <74426A7C505C4F1888E793785EFD8F15@hal> Sorry for the noise, but is there anyone on the list from gmail? Is anyone else having trouble with delivery to gmail. My customers are getting the following messages : host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[172.217.194.26] said: 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 12] Gmail has detected that this message is 550-5.7.1 likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of spam sent to Gmail, 550-5.7.1 this message has been blocked. For more information, go to 550 5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError bz9-20020a056a02060900b005cdffc2828esi7631435pgb.182 - gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command) and : host aspmx.l.google.com[172.253.118.26] said: 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 19] Gmail has detected that this message is 550-5.7.1 likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of the sending 550-5.7.1 domain. To best protect our users from spam, the message has been 550-5.7.1 blocked. For more information, go to 550 5.7.1 https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 e13-20020a63f54d000000b005ce025116bbsi12152612pgk.858 - gsmtp (in reply to end of DATA command) Ive been through my mail logs and cant find any reason why email is being blocked from the mail server. There has been no misuse of late. There was on another hosting server which is in my spf record. The hosting server had a customer account misused via sasl auth. That was fixed 8 days ago. Are gmail blocking on domain name now and not IP address / host name I have added the google verification IN TXT in DNS Is anyone else having or had issues like this ? Can anyone recomend a contact for google / gmail? or a fix / work around Regards Tim HaleNET Internet ABN: 57 014 068 268 e-mail admin at halenet.com.au http://www.halenet.com.au P.O. Box 554 Stanthorpe Q 4380 Phone (07) 46814999 Bus Hours Phone (07) 46852194 After Hours HaleNET Pty Ltd ACN (082 330 121) as trustee for the McCullagh Family Trust Trading as HaleNET -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From glp71s at gmail.com Mon Feb 5 18:01:22 2024 From: glp71s at gmail.com (Giles Pollock) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 18:01:22 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Is anyone on ausnog from gmail In-Reply-To: <74426A7C505C4F1888E793785EFD8F15@hal> References: <0581BCF6-E04C-4328-BA3E-EBB385B5E930@langshaw.id.au> <74426A7C505C4F1888E793785EFD8F15@hal> Message-ID: Likely to be this... https://blog.google/products/gmail/gmail-security-authentication-spam-protection/ On Mon, Feb 5, 2024 at 5:52?PM Tim McCullagh wrote: > Sorry for the noise, but is there anyone on the list from gmail? > > Is anyone else having trouble with delivery to gmail. My customers are > getting the following messages > > : host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[172.217.194.26] > said: 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 12] Gmail has detected that this > message is 550-5.7.1 likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of > spam > sent to Gmail, 550-5.7.1 this message has been blocked. For more > information, go to 550 5.7.1 > https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError > bz9-20020a056a02060900b005cdffc2828esi7631435pgb.182 - gsmtp (in reply > to > end of DATA command) > > and > > > : host aspmx.l.google.com[172.253.118.26] said: > 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 19] Gmail has detected that this > message > is > 550-5.7.1 likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of the > sending > 550-5.7.1 domain. To best protect our users from spam, the message has > been > 550-5.7.1 blocked. For more information, go to 550 5.7.1 > https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 > e13-20020a63f54d000000b005ce025116bbsi12152612pgk.858 - gsmtp (in > reply > to > end of DATA command) > > > Ive been through my mail logs and cant find any reason why email is being > blocked from the mail server. There has been no misuse of late. There > was on another hosting server which is in my spf record. The hosting > server had a customer account misused via sasl auth. That > was fixed 8 days ago. Are gmail blocking on domain name now and not IP > address / host name > > I have added the google verification IN TXT in DNS > > > Is anyone else having or had issues like this ? > > Can anyone recomend a contact for google / gmail? or a fix / work around > > > > Regards > > Tim > > HaleNET Internet > ABN: 57 014 068 268 > e-mail admin at halenet.com.au > http://www.halenet.com.au > P.O. Box 554 Stanthorpe Q 4380 > Phone (07) 46814999 Bus Hours > Phone (07) 46852194 After Hours > > HaleNET Pty Ltd ACN (082 330 121) > as trustee for the McCullagh Family Trust > Trading as HaleNET > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dazzagibbs at gmail.com Mon Feb 5 19:35:10 2024 From: dazzagibbs at gmail.com (DaZZa) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 19:35:10 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Is anyone on ausnog from gmail In-Reply-To: <74426A7C505C4F1888E793785EFD8F15@hal> References: <0581BCF6-E04C-4328-BA3E-EBB385B5E930@langshaw.id.au> <74426A7C505C4F1888E793785EFD8F15@hal> Message-ID: Google and Yahoo have implemented changes recently. AWS's summary is here https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-targeting/an-overview-of-bulk-sender-changes-at-yahoo-gmail/ You're likely getting caught up in that. D On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, 5:52 pm Tim McCullagh, wrote: > Sorry for the noise, but is there anyone on the list from gmail? > > Is anyone else having trouble with delivery to gmail. My customers are > getting the following messages > > : host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[172.217.194.26] > said: 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 12] Gmail has detected that this > message is 550-5.7.1 likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of > spam > sent to Gmail, 550-5.7.1 this message has been blocked. For more > information, go to 550 5.7.1 > https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError > bz9-20020a056a02060900b005cdffc2828esi7631435pgb.182 - gsmtp (in reply > to > end of DATA command) > > and > > > : host aspmx.l.google.com[172.253.118.26] said: > 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 19] Gmail has detected that this > message > is > 550-5.7.1 likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of the > sending > 550-5.7.1 domain. To best protect our users from spam, the message has > been > 550-5.7.1 blocked. For more information, go to 550 5.7.1 > https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 > e13-20020a63f54d000000b005ce025116bbsi12152612pgk.858 - gsmtp (in > reply > to > end of DATA command) > > > Ive been through my mail logs and cant find any reason why email is being > blocked from the mail server. There has been no misuse of late. There > was on another hosting server which is in my spf record. The hosting > server had a customer account misused via sasl auth. That > was fixed 8 days ago. Are gmail blocking on domain name now and not IP > address / host name > > I have added the google verification IN TXT in DNS > > > Is anyone else having or had issues like this ? > > Can anyone recomend a contact for google / gmail? or a fix / work around > > > > Regards > > Tim > > HaleNET Internet > ABN: 57 014 068 268 > e-mail admin at halenet.com.au > http://www.halenet.com.au > P.O. Box 554 Stanthorpe Q 4380 > Phone (07) 46814999 Bus Hours > Phone (07) 46852194 After Hours > > HaleNET Pty Ltd ACN (082 330 121) > as trustee for the McCullagh Family Trust > Trading as HaleNET > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From brad at nimbus.net.au Mon Feb 5 21:57:16 2024 From: brad at nimbus.net.au (Brad Eckert) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 21:57:16 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Is anyone on ausnog from gmail In-Reply-To: References: <0581BCF6-E04C-4328-BA3E-EBB385B5E930@langshaw.id.au> <74426A7C505C4F1888E793785EFD8F15@hal> Message-ID: The way this was implemented is very frustrating. I assisted a few orgs that, I had done consultancy for prior. But many out there are only just now, going to notice and go WTF? And these are not black and white, meaning that is you move into a "compliant" state with regards to SPF, DKIM and blah signed TXT records. The "reputation" of the now tainted domain will take some time to correct itself. Google will not resolve this. The reputation will need to build back up, you can email my address direct. As I have Google Workspaces Enterprise with all the verbose logging for mail. Validating the delivery to gmail workspaces vs vanilla freemium gmail accounts would be interesting. You could also build a sub domain, marketing email comms often use this method of sending via noreply at info.example.com .. default policy allows then penalises if you do not tick the boxes (there are many others beyond just TXT signing .. reverse-dns etc. Could this all be a ploy to nudge small to medium biz to sign up for Google Workspaces as their business fails without email ? hmm Regards, Brad On Mon, 5 Feb 2024 at 19:35, DaZZa wrote: > Google and Yahoo have implemented changes recently. > > AWS's summary is here > > > https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-targeting/an-overview-of-bulk-sender-changes-at-yahoo-gmail/ > > You're likely getting caught up in that. > > D > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, 5:52 pm Tim McCullagh, > wrote: > >> Sorry for the noise, but is there anyone on the list from gmail? >> >> Is anyone else having trouble with delivery to gmail. My customers are >> getting the following messages >> >> : host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com[172.217.194.26] >> said: 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 12] Gmail has detected that this >> message is 550-5.7.1 likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of >> spam >> sent to Gmail, 550-5.7.1 this message has been blocked. For more >> information, go to 550 5.7.1 >> https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError >> bz9-20020a056a02060900b005cdffc2828esi7631435pgb.182 - gsmtp (in reply >> to >> end of DATA command) >> >> and >> >> >> : host aspmx.l.google.com[172.253.118.26] said: >> 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 19] Gmail has detected that this >> message >> is >> 550-5.7.1 likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of the >> sending >> 550-5.7.1 domain. To best protect our users from spam, the message >> has >> been >> 550-5.7.1 blocked. For more information, go to 550 5.7.1 >> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 >> e13-20020a63f54d000000b005ce025116bbsi12152612pgk.858 - gsmtp (in >> reply >> to >> end of DATA command) >> >> >> Ive been through my mail logs and cant find any reason why email is being >> blocked from the mail server. There has been no misuse of late. There >> was on another hosting server which is in my spf record. The hosting >> server had a customer account misused via sasl auth. That >> was fixed 8 days ago. Are gmail blocking on domain name now and not IP >> address / host name >> >> I have added the google verification IN TXT in DNS >> >> >> Is anyone else having or had issues like this ? >> >> Can anyone recomend a contact for google / gmail? or a fix / work around >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Tim >> >> HaleNET Internet >> ABN: 57 014 068 268 >> e-mail admin at halenet.com.au >> http://www.halenet.com.au >> P.O. Box 554 Stanthorpe Q 4380 >> Phone (07) 46814999 Bus Hours >> Phone (07) 46852194 After Hours >> >> HaleNET Pty Ltd ACN (082 330 121) >> as trustee for the McCullagh Family Trust >> Trading as HaleNET >> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net >> https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From dave.taht at gmail.com Tue Feb 6 05:01:22 2024 From: dave.taht at gmail.com (Dave Taht) Date: Mon, 5 Feb 2024 13:01:22 -0500 Subject: [AusNOG] If you haven't had the time, energy or money to try libreqos Message-ID: These folk are putting out some grant money. We (libreqos) are very interested in seeing what can be done to replace brittle policers, and improve wireless long and short haul networks and would love to see someone attempting an ISP or IXP sized deployment down there... https://apnic.foundation/2024-isif-asia-applications-now-open/ -- 40 years of net history, a couple songs: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D9RGX6QFm5E Dave T?ht CSO, LibreQos From Clovis at netcore.com.au Tue Feb 6 14:18:23 2024 From: Clovis at netcore.com.au (Steve Dimitrio) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:18:23 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency Message-ID: 1 2 ms 1 ms <1 ms Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] 3 4 ms 3 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 76 ms 76 ms * po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] seeing latency when we hit aapt from the outside via NBN connections Steve Dimitrio Netcore PTY LTD Office: 03 9725 1469 Mobile: 0411175886 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Nathan.Brookfield at iperium.com.au Tue Feb 6 14:25:51 2024 From: Nathan.Brookfield at iperium.com.au (Nathan Brookfield) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:25:51 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: That doesn't look bad, what are the next few hops? From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Steve Dimitrio Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:18 PM To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency 1 2 ms 1 ms <1 ms Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] 3 4 ms 3 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 76 ms 76 ms * po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] seeing latency when we hit aapt from the outside via NBN connections Steve Dimitrio Netcore PTY LTD Office: 03 9725 1469 Mobile: 0411175886 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Clovis at netcore.com.au Tue Feb 6 14:28:51 2024 From: Clovis at netcore.com.au (Steve Dimitrio) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:28:51 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] 2 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] 3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 * 77 ms 77 ms po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] 6 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.51 7 * 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.120 8 75 ms 75 ms 75 ms te2-1-111.mflindist02.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.169] 9 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 5-1-1.mflininte01.aapt.net.au [203.131.61.13] 10 81 ms 81 ms 81 ms 210.87.55.34 From: Nathan Brookfield Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:26 PM To: Steve Dimitrio ; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency That doesn't look bad, what are the next few hops? From: AusNOG > On Behalf Of Steve Dimitrio Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:18 PM To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency 1 2 ms 1 ms <1 ms Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] 3 4 ms 3 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 76 ms 76 ms * po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] seeing latency when we hit aapt from the outside via NBN connections Steve Dimitrio Netcore PTY LTD Office: 03 9725 1469 Mobile: 0411175886 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mitchkelly24 at gmail.com Tue Feb 6 14:32:29 2024 From: mitchkelly24 at gmail.com (Mitch Kelly) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 11:32:29 +0800 Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Escalate it to your account manager. This is not a Tech support channel :) On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:29?AM Steve Dimitrio wrote: > 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms > Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] > > 2 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms > bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] > > 3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms > bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] > > 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net > [139.130.48.226] > > 5 * 77 ms 77 ms po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au > [202.10.12.42] > > 6 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.51 > > 7 * 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.120 > > 8 75 ms 75 ms 75 ms te2-1-111.mflindist02.aapt.net.au > [202.10.12.169] > > 9 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 5-1-1.mflininte01.aapt.net.au > [203.131.61.13] > > 10 81 ms 81 ms 81 ms 210.87.55.34 > > > > *From:* Nathan Brookfield > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:26 PM > *To:* Steve Dimitrio ; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net > *Subject:* RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency > > > > That doesn?t look bad, what are the next few hops? > > > > *From:* AusNOG *On Behalf Of *Steve > Dimitrio > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:18 PM > *To:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net > *Subject:* [AusNOG] AAPT latency > > > > 1 2 ms 1 ms <1 ms > Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] > > 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms > bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] > > 3 4 ms 3 ms 1 ms > bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] > > 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net > [139.130.48.226] > > * 5 76 ms 76 ms * po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au > [202.10.12.42]* > > > > > > seeing latency when we hit aapt from the outside via NBN connections > > > > > > > > > > Steve Dimitrio > > Netcore PTY LTD > > Office: 03 9725 1469 > > Mobile: 0411175886 > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Nathan.Brookfield at iperium.com.au Tue Feb 6 14:37:55 2024 From: Nathan.Brookfield at iperium.com.au (Nathan Brookfield) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:37:55 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Looks like an issue with that path from Telstra Melbourne and how it touches AAPT's network, I'm not seeing this from Sydney via Telstra. 4 ae25.alx-edge411.sydney.telstra.net (138.217.142.213) 0.286 ms 0.262 ms 0.240 ms 5 bundle-ether50.hay-core30.sydney.telstra.net (203.50.12.130) 1.939 ms 12.800 ms 1.913 ms 6 bundle-ether1.ken-edge903.sydney.telstra.net (203.50.11.173) 0.836 ms 0.970 ms 1.134 ms 7 aap3461200.lnk.telstra.net (110.145.193.106) 1.527 ms 1.656 ms 1.632 ms 8 * * * 9 bu12.sclarcore01.aapt.net.au (202.10.12.9) 13.753 ms 14.442 ms 14.423 ms 10 bu1.AU-VI-BURN-COR-01.aapt.net.au (202.10.10.75) 14.082 ms bu12.sclarcore01.aapt.net.au (202.10.12.9) 14.392 ms 14.373 ms 11 bu1.AU-VI-BURN-COR-01.aapt.net.au (202.10.10.75) 14.030 ms 14.098 ms 202.10.10.139 (202.10.10.139) 14.373 ms 12 * 202.10.10.139 (202.10.10.139) 14.337 ms 14.316 ms 13 5-1-1.mflininte01.aapt.net.au (203.131.61.13) 13.430 ms * * 14 210.87.55.34 (210.87.55.34) 18.443 ms 18.403 ms 18.169 ms From: Steve Dimitrio Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:29 PM To: Nathan Brookfield ; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] 2 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] 3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 * 77 ms 77 ms po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] 6 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.51 7 * 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.120 8 75 ms 75 ms 75 ms te2-1-111.mflindist02.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.169] 9 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 5-1-1.mflininte01.aapt.net.au [203.131.61.13] 10 81 ms 81 ms 81 ms 210.87.55.34 From: Nathan Brookfield > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:26 PM To: Steve Dimitrio >; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency That doesn't look bad, what are the next few hops? From: AusNOG > On Behalf Of Steve Dimitrio Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:18 PM To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency 1 2 ms 1 ms <1 ms Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] 3 4 ms 3 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 76 ms 76 ms * po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] seeing latency when we hit aapt from the outside via NBN connections Steve Dimitrio Netcore PTY LTD Office: 03 9725 1469 Mobile: 0411175886 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Clovis at netcore.com.au Tue Feb 6 14:39:04 2024 From: Clovis at netcore.com.au (Steve Dimitrio) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 03:39:04 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Well done that's right! Spoken to another guy who agrees From: Nathan Brookfield Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:38 PM To: Steve Dimitrio ; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency Looks like an issue with that path from Telstra Melbourne and how it touches AAPT's network, I'm not seeing this from Sydney via Telstra. 4 ae25.alx-edge411.sydney.telstra.net (138.217.142.213) 0.286 ms 0.262 ms 0.240 ms 5 bundle-ether50.hay-core30.sydney.telstra.net (203.50.12.130) 1.939 ms 12.800 ms 1.913 ms 6 bundle-ether1.ken-edge903.sydney.telstra.net (203.50.11.173) 0.836 ms 0.970 ms 1.134 ms 7 aap3461200.lnk.telstra.net (110.145.193.106) 1.527 ms 1.656 ms 1.632 ms 8 * * * 9 bu12.sclarcore01.aapt.net.au (202.10.12.9) 13.753 ms 14.442 ms 14.423 ms 10 bu1.AU-VI-BURN-COR-01.aapt.net.au (202.10.10.75) 14.082 ms bu12.sclarcore01.aapt.net.au (202.10.12.9) 14.392 ms 14.373 ms 11 bu1.AU-VI-BURN-COR-01.aapt.net.au (202.10.10.75) 14.030 ms 14.098 ms 202.10.10.139 (202.10.10.139) 14.373 ms 12 * 202.10.10.139 (202.10.10.139) 14.337 ms 14.316 ms 13 5-1-1.mflininte01.aapt.net.au (203.131.61.13) 13.430 ms * * 14 210.87.55.34 (210.87.55.34) 18.443 ms 18.403 ms 18.169 ms From: Steve Dimitrio > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:29 PM To: Nathan Brookfield >; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency 1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] 2 1 ms 2 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] 3 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 * 77 ms 77 ms po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] 6 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.51 7 * 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.120 8 75 ms 75 ms 75 ms te2-1-111.mflindist02.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.169] 9 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 5-1-1.mflininte01.aapt.net.au [203.131.61.13] 10 81 ms 81 ms 81 ms 210.87.55.34 From: Nathan Brookfield > Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:26 PM To: Steve Dimitrio >; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency That doesn't look bad, what are the next few hops? From: AusNOG > On Behalf Of Steve Dimitrio Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:18 PM To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency 1 2 ms 1 ms <1 ms Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] 2 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] 3 4 ms 3 ms 1 ms bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 76 ms 76 ms * po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] seeing latency when we hit aapt from the outside via NBN connections Steve Dimitrio Netcore PTY LTD Office: 03 9725 1469 Mobile: 0411175886 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From luke at iggleden.com Tue Feb 6 14:44:39 2024 From: luke at iggleden.com (Luke Iggleden) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 14:44:39 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: We have a MLL down NSW south coast to Sydney, Telstra issue seems to be between Deakin to SYD as reported... could be related. On 6/2/2024 2:39 pm, Steve Dimitrio wrote: > > Well done that?s right! Spoken to another guy who agrees > > *From:*Nathan Brookfield > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:38 PM > *To:* Steve Dimitrio ; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net > *Subject:* RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency > > Looks like an issue with that path from Telstra Melbourne and how it > touches AAPT?s network, I?m not seeing this from Sydney via Telstra. > > 4? ae25.alx-edge411.sydney.telstra.net (138.217.142.213)? 0.286 ms? > 0.262 ms? 0.240 ms > > 5 bundle-ether50.hay-core30.sydney.telstra.net (203.50.12.130) 1.939 > ms? 12.800 ms? 1.913 ms > > 6 bundle-ether1.ken-edge903.sydney.telstra.net (203.50.11.173) 0.836 > ms? 0.970 ms? 1.134 ms > > 7? aap3461200.lnk.telstra.net (110.145.193.106)? 1.527 ms? 1.656 ms? > 1.632 ms > > 8? * * * > > 9? bu12.sclarcore01.aapt.net.au (202.10.12.9)? 13.753 ms? 14.442 ms? > 14.423 ms > > 10? bu1.AU-VI-BURN-COR-01.aapt.net.au (202.10.10.75)? 14.082 ms > bu12.sclarcore01.aapt.net.au (202.10.12.9)? 14.392 ms? 14.373 ms > > 11? bu1.AU-VI-BURN-COR-01.aapt.net.au (202.10.10.75)? 14.030 ms? > 14.098 ms 202.10.10.139 (202.10.10.139)? 14.373 ms > > 12? * 202.10.10.139 (202.10.10.139)? 14.337 ms? 14.316 ms > > 13? 5-1-1.mflininte01.aapt.net.au (203.131.61.13)? 13.430 ms * * > > 14? 210.87.55.34 (210.87.55.34)? 18.443 ms 18.403 ms? 18.169 ms > > *From:*Steve Dimitrio > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:29 PM > *To:* Nathan Brookfield ; > ausnog at lists.ausnog.net > *Subject:* RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency > > 1???? 1 ms???? 1 ms???? 1 ms > Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] > > ? 2???? 1 ms???? 2 ms???? 1 ms > bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] > > ? 3???? 1 ms???? 1 ms???? 1 ms > bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] > > ? 4???? 1 ms???? 1 ms???? 1 ms? aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net > [139.130.48.226] > > ? 5 *?????? 77 ms??? 77 ms? po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] > > ? 6??? 76 ms??? 76 ms??? 76 ms? 202.10.12.51 > > ? 7 *?????? 76 ms??? 76 ms? 202.10.12.120 > > ? 8??? 75 ms??? 75 ms??? 75 ms? te2-1-111.mflindist02.aapt.net.au > [202.10.12.169] > > ? 9??? 76 ms??? 76 ms??? 76 ms? 5-1-1.mflininte01.aapt.net.au > [203.131.61.13] > > 10??? 81 ms??? 81 ms??? 81 ms? 210.87.55.34 > > *From:*Nathan Brookfield > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:26 PM > *To:* Steve Dimitrio ; ausnog at lists.ausnog.net > *Subject:* RE: [AusNOG] AAPT latency > > That doesn?t look bad, what are the next few hops? > > *From:*AusNOG *On Behalf Of *Steve > Dimitrio > *Sent:* Tuesday, February 6, 2024 2:18 PM > *To:* ausnog at lists.ausnog.net > *Subject:* [AusNOG] AAPT latency > > 1???? 2 ms???? 1 ms??? <1 ms > Bundle-Ether1053-398.lon-edge902.melbourne.telstra.net [203.54.234.229] > > ? 2???? 1 ms???? 1 ms???? 1 ms > bundle-ether11.exi-core30.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.113] > > ? 3???? 4 ms???? 3 ms???? 1 ms > bundle-ether1.lon-edge903.melbourne.telstra.net [203.50.11.199] > > ? 4???? 1 ms???? 1 ms???? 1 ms? aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net > [139.130.48.226] > > *? 5??? 76 ms??? 76 ms???? *???? po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au > [202.10.12.42]* > > seeing latency ?when we hit aapt from the outside via NBN connections > > Steve Dimitrio > > Netcore PTY LTD > > Office: 03 9725 1469 > > Mobile: 0411175886 > > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tony at wicks.co.nz Tue Feb 6 15:14:02 2024 From: tony at wicks.co.nz (Tony Wicks) Date: Tue, 6 Feb 2024 17:14:02 +1300 Subject: [AusNOG] AAPT latency In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <01f701da58b2$edf0b890$c9d229b0$@wicks.co.nz> I would submit that ?I?m seeing potentially unusual network behaviour on the interconnect between network A and network B, is anyone else seeing it? is exactly what a network operators group is for. From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Mitch Kelly Sent: Tuesday, February 6, 2024 4:32 PM To: Steve Dimitrio Cc: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: Re: [AusNOG] AAPT latency Escalate it to your account manager. This is not a Tech support channel :) On Tue, Feb 6, 2024 at 11:29?AM Steve Dimitrio > wrote: 4 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms aap3854405.lnk.telstra.net [139.130.48.226] 5 * 77 ms 77 ms po13.sglobdist01.aapt.net.au [202.10.12.42] 6 76 ms 76 ms 76 ms 202.10.12.51 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au Thu Feb 8 08:09:22 2024 From: Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au (Darren Moss) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 21:09:22 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney Message-ID: Hi All, We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility for a customer in Sydney. I am looking for options / suggestions for facilities similar to EDC in Melbourne if possible. Connectivity, power, genset, desks, kitchen, etc. Approximately 85-100 people in full DR mode. Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. We're currently in design phase, looking at capability and cost. Happy to hear off list if more suitable. Many thanks Darren. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From kauer at biplane.com.au Thu Feb 8 09:31:51 2024 From: kauer at biplane.com.au (Karl Auer) Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 09:31:51 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 21:09 +0000, Darren Moss wrote: > We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility > [...] > Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. Is that ping time, driving time, walking time or running and screaming time? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer From Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au Thu Feb 8 09:36:15 2024 From: Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au (Darren Moss) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 22:36:15 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <80cdab9a5bf647919dbeefddd416d28d@mbx05.ap.myhostedexchange.email> Depending on the event, possibly all of them ? It will be drive time. Need some physical separation, like we have from Port Melb to Mitcham. D. -----Original Message----- From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Karl Auer Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 9:32 AM To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 21:09 +0000, Darren Moss wrote: > We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility [...] Must be > at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. Is that ping time, driving time, walking time or running and screaming time? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog From nathan at lenevez.net.au Thu Feb 8 09:39:46 2024 From: nathan at lenevez.net.au (Nathan Le Nevez) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 22:39:46 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Mascot (eg. SY1) can be > 30 minutes drive away from Alexandria (eg. SY3) if you pick the right time of day for traffic... ? ________________________________ From: AusNOG on behalf of Karl Auer Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 09:31 To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 21:09 +0000, Darren Moss wrote: > We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility > [...] > Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. Is that ping time, driving time, walking time or running and screaming time? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au Thu Feb 8 09:44:29 2024 From: Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au (Darren Moss) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 22:44:29 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: That?s why I walk between them ? OK, assume at least 15klms away from Bourke Road, Alexandria. D. From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Nathan Le Nevez Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 9:40 AM To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' ; kauer at biplane.com.au Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney Mascot (eg. SY1) can be > 30 minutes drive away from Alexandria (eg. SY3) if you pick the right time of day for traffic... ? ________________________________ From: AusNOG > on behalf of Karl Auer > Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 09:31 To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' > Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 21:09 +0000, Darren Moss wrote: > We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility > [...] > Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. Is that ping time, driving time, walking time or running and screaming time? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ben at sellick.id.au Thu Feb 8 09:50:10 2024 From: ben at sellick.id.au (Ben Sellick) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 22:50:10 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Airtrunk SYD1 is in Western Sydney, seemed to be a popular option for a number of customers (in my previous job) who also had kit in SY3/SY4. Ben From: AusNOG On Behalf Of Darren Moss Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 9:44 AM To: Nathan Le Nevez ; 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' ; kauer at biplane.com.au Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney That?s why I walk between them ? OK, assume at least 15klms away from Bourke Road, Alexandria. D. From: AusNOG > On Behalf Of Nathan Le Nevez Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 9:40 AM To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' >; kauer at biplane.com.au Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney Mascot (eg. SY1) can be > 30 minutes drive away from Alexandria (eg. SY3) if you pick the right time of day for traffic... ? ________________________________ From: AusNOG > on behalf of Karl Auer > Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 09:31 To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' > Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 21:09 +0000, Darren Moss wrote: > We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility > [...] > Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. Is that ping time, driving time, walking time or running and screaming time? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au Thu Feb 8 09:54:22 2024 From: Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au (Darren Moss) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 22:54:22 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <7ebc18d716494bc3adb8c012a1aab84d@mbx05.ap.myhostedexchange.email> Airtrunk is a DC, not a DR site. D. From: Ben Sellick Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 9:50 AM To: Darren Moss ; 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' Subject: RE: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney Airtrunk SYD1 is in Western Sydney, seemed to be a popular option for a number of customers (in my previous job) who also had kit in SY3/SY4. Ben From: AusNOG > On Behalf Of Darren Moss Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 9:44 AM To: Nathan Le Nevez >; 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' >; kauer at biplane.com.au Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney That?s why I walk between them ? OK, assume at least 15klms away from Bourke Road, Alexandria. D. From: AusNOG > On Behalf Of Nathan Le Nevez Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 9:40 AM To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' >; kauer at biplane.com.au Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney Mascot (eg. SY1) can be > 30 minutes drive away from Alexandria (eg. SY3) if you pick the right time of day for traffic... ? ________________________________ From: AusNOG > on behalf of Karl Auer > Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 09:31 To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' > Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 21:09 +0000, Darren Moss wrote: > We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility > [...] > Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. Is that ping time, driving time, walking time or running and screaming time? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From ben at sellick.id.au Thu Feb 8 10:22:15 2024 From: ben at sellick.id.au (Ben Sellick) Date: Wed, 7 Feb 2024 23:22:15 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: <7ebc18d716494bc3adb8c012a1aab84d@mbx05.ap.myhostedexchange.email> References: <7ebc18d716494bc3adb8c012a1aab84d@mbx05.ap.myhostedexchange.email> Message-ID: Admittedly I only realised that I misread your initial email *after* I clicked send ? my bad ? someone needs another coffee. From: Darren Moss Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 9:54 AM To: Ben Sellick ; 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' Subject: RE: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney Airtrunk is a DC, not a DR site. D. From: Ben Sellick > Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 9:50 AM To: Darren Moss >; 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' > Subject: RE: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney Airtrunk SYD1 is in Western Sydney, seemed to be a popular option for a number of customers (in my previous job) who also had kit in SY3/SY4. Ben From: AusNOG > On Behalf Of Darren Moss Sent: Thursday, February 8, 2024 9:44 AM To: Nathan Le Nevez >; 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' >; kauer at biplane.com.au Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney That?s why I walk between them ? OK, assume at least 15klms away from Bourke Road, Alexandria. D. From: AusNOG > On Behalf Of Nathan Le Nevez Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 9:40 AM To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' >; kauer at biplane.com.au Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney Mascot (eg. SY1) can be > 30 minutes drive away from Alexandria (eg. SY3) if you pick the right time of day for traffic... ? ________________________________ From: AusNOG > on behalf of Karl Auer > Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 09:31 To: 'AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net' > Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 21:09 +0000, Darren Moss wrote: > We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility > [...] > Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. Is that ping time, driving time, walking time or running and screaming time? Regards, K. -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Karl Auer (kauer at biplane.com.au) http://www.biplane.com.au/kauer _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au Thu Feb 8 12:49:50 2024 From: glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au (glenn.satchell at uniq.com.au) Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2024 12:49:50 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Is anyone on ausnog from gmail In-Reply-To: References: <0581BCF6-E04C-4328-BA3E-EBB385B5E930@langshaw.id.au> <74426A7C505C4F1888E793785EFD8F15@hal> Message-ID: <4054f88272df7225e5830bd63ef3a6b4@uniq.com.au> Hi Tim, Been through this recently. I have a couple of cloud VMs that need to send email from my domain. Adding openDKIM fixed that. There's a few resources on the net describing the procedure, searching for "install opendkim on ubuntu" or whichever linux distro you have will get you there. There's sites to test the headers, spaminess, etc, in the instructions. DKIM adds an email header signed with a private key, the public key goes in a DNS record so the receiver can validate the header. regards, Glenn On 2024-02-05 19:35, DaZZa wrote: > Google and Yahoo have implemented changes recently. > > AWS's summary is here > > https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/messaging-and-targeting/an-overview-of-bulk-sender-changes-at-yahoo-gmail/ > > You're likely getting caught up in that. > > D > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2024, 5:52 pm Tim McCullagh, > wrote: > >> Sorry for the noise, but is there anyone on the list from gmail? >> >> Is anyone else having trouble with delivery to gmail. My customers >> are >> getting the following messages >> >> : host gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com >> [1][172.217.194.26] >> said: 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 12] Gmail has detected that this >> message is 550-5.7.1 likely unsolicited mail. To reduce the amount of >> spam >> sent to Gmail, 550-5.7.1 this message has been blocked. For more >> information, go to 550 5.7.1 >> https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError [2] >> bz9-20020a056a02060900b005cdffc2828esi7631435pgb.182 - gsmtp (in reply >> to >> end of DATA command) >> >> and >> >> : host aspmx.l.google.com [3][172.253.118.26] said: >> 550-5.7.1 [203.17.235.145 19] Gmail has detected that this >> message >> is >> 550-5.7.1 likely suspicious due to the very low reputation of the >> sending >> 550-5.7.1 domain. To best protect our users from spam, the message has >> been >> 550-5.7.1 blocked. For more information, go to 550 5.7.1 >> https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 [4] >> e13-20020a63f54d000000b005ce025116bbsi12152612pgk.858 - gsmtp (in >> reply >> to >> end of DATA command) >> >> Ive been through my mail logs and cant find any reason why email is >> being >> blocked from the mail server. There has been no misuse of late. >> There >> was on another hosting server which is in my spf record. The hosting >> server had a customer account misused via sasl auth. That >> was fixed 8 days ago. Are gmail blocking on domain name now and not >> IP >> address / host name >> >> I have added the google verification IN TXT in DNS >> >> Is anyone else having or had issues like this ? >> >> Can anyone recomend a contact for google / gmail? or a fix / work >> around >> >> Regards >> >> Tim >> >> HaleNET Internet >> ABN: 57 014 068 268 >> e-mail admin at halenet.com.au >> http://www.halenet.com.au [5] >> P.O. Box 554 Stanthorpe Q 4380 >> Phone (07) 46814999 Bus Hours >> Phone (07) 46852194 After Hours >> >> HaleNET Pty Ltd ACN (082 330 121) >> as trustee for the McCullagh Family Trust >> Trading as HaleNET >> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net >> https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog Links: ------ [1] http://gmail-smtp-in.l.google.com [2] https://support.google.com/mail/?p=UnsolicitedMessageError [3] http://aspmx.l.google.com [4] https://support.google.com/mail/answer/188131 [5] http://www.halenet.com.au/ -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From tim at jacksons.net.au Thu Feb 8 14:47:06 2024 From: tim at jacksons.net.au (Tim Jackson) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 14:47:06 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: An on-site barista is included at the Interactive DR site in St Leonards. But it's only 14.4 km from Bourke Rd Alexandria. https://www.interactive.com.au/services/business-continuity-site/ * I haven't used them so I don't have any comments/recommendations it just ticks off your requirements. On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 8:09?AM Darren Moss wrote: > Hi All, > > > > We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility for a customer in > Sydney. > > > > I am looking for options / suggestions for facilities similar to EDC in > Melbourne if possible. > > > > Connectivity, power, genset, desks, kitchen, etc. > > > > Approximately 85-100 people in full DR mode. > > > > Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. > > > > We?re currently in design phase, looking at capability and cost. > > > > Happy to hear off list if more suitable. > > > > Many thanks > > > > > > Darren. > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au Thu Feb 8 14:50:37 2024 From: Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au (Darren Moss) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 03:50:37 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: <8245de15884b498f9c913fd5cc68e27c@mbx05.ap.myhostedexchange.email> Hi Tim, Yes I know the Interactive locations and that?s a good one, however it?s less than 15klms away. Cheers D. From: Tim Jackson Sent: Thursday, 8 February 2024 2:47 PM To: Darren Moss Cc: AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net Subject: Re: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney An on-site barista is included at the Interactive DR site in St Leonards. But it's only 14.4 km from Bourke Rd Alexandria. https://www.interactive.com.au/services/business-continuity-site/ * I haven't used them so I don't have any comments/recommendations it just ticks off your requirements. On Thu, Feb 8, 2024 at 8:09?AM Darren Moss > wrote: Hi All, We have a project to create an off-site full DR facility for a customer in Sydney. I am looking for options / suggestions for facilities similar to EDC in Melbourne if possible. Connectivity, power, genset, desks, kitchen, etc. Approximately 85-100 people in full DR mode. Must be at least 30 mins away from Alexandria. We?re currently in design phase, looking at capability and cost. Happy to hear off list if more suitable. Many thanks Darren. _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au Thu Feb 8 18:47:04 2024 From: Darren.Moss at cloud365.com.au (Darren Moss) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 07:47:04 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Disaster Recovery Site Options in Sydney - Thank you In-Reply-To: <8245de15884b498f9c913fd5cc68e27c@mbx05.ap.myhostedexchange.email> References: <8245de15884b498f9c913fd5cc68e27c@mbx05.ap.myhostedexchange.email> Message-ID: <6e6de1a9a4714178b2155031a9d821c7@mbx05.ap.myhostedexchange.email> Thanks everyone for the replies, we?re in discussions with various parties. D. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From spoofer-info at caida.org Fri Feb 9 05:00:13 2024 From: spoofer-info at caida.org (CAIDA Spoofer Project) Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2024 10:00:13 -0800 Subject: [AusNOG] Spoofer Report for AusNOG for Jan 2024 Message-ID: <1707415213.024022.29010.nullmailer@caida.org> In response to feedback from operational security communities, CAIDA's source address validation measurement project (https://spoofer.caida.org) is automatically generating monthly reports of ASes originating prefixes in BGP for systems from which we received packets with a spoofed source address. We are publishing these reports to network and security operations lists in order to ensure this information reaches operational contacts in these ASes. This report summarises tests conducted within aus. Inferred improvements during Jan 2024: ASN Name Fixed-By 147020 2024-01-02 213382 2024-01-12 Further information for the inferred remediation is available at: https://spoofer.caida.org/remedy.php Source Address Validation issues inferred during Jan 2024: none inferred Please send any feedback or suggestions to spoofer-info at caida.org From russell3901 at gmail.com Thu Feb 15 12:09:59 2024 From: russell3901 at gmail.com (Russell Langton) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:09:59 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] Vale Bruce Forster Message-ID: Hi All, I've been advised that Bruce Forster passed away suddenly on Tuesday. He was Ex-OTW,Ex-Superloop and currently Orgin. I was lucky enough to enjoy a beer with him on GC at ausnog, but we kept getting interrupted with all the people who wanted to say hi because he was such an awesome human. Bruce?s passing is a huge loss to the industry. I will provide service details when received. RIP. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cameron.murray at gmail.com Thu Feb 15 12:19:36 2024 From: cameron.murray at gmail.com (Cameron Murray) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:19:36 +1000 Subject: [AusNOG] Vale Bruce Forster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Such a big personality and an all round good guy. We had the pleasure of working with him initially at ApexN and then Superloop. Condolences to his family. Kind Regards Cameron On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:10?AM Russell Langton wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been advised that Bruce Forster passed away suddenly on Tuesday. > > He was Ex-OTW,Ex-Superloop and currently Orgin. > I was lucky enough to enjoy a beer with him on GC at ausnog, but we kept > getting interrupted with all the people who wanted to say hi because he was > such an awesome human. > > Bruce?s passing is a huge loss to the industry. > > I will provide service details when received. > > RIP. > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From mbw.whitlock at gmail.com Thu Feb 15 12:21:38 2024 From: mbw.whitlock at gmail.com (Matt Whitlock) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 11:21:38 +1000 Subject: [AusNOG] Vale Bruce Forster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Seconded, Cameron. A great guy and a lot of fun in the office. He will be missed. Ta, Matt. On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 11:20, Cameron Murray wrote: > Such a big personality and an all round good guy. We had the pleasure of > working with him initially at ApexN and then Superloop. > > Condolences to his family. > > Kind Regards > > Cameron > > > On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 11:10?AM Russell Langton > wrote: > >> Hi All, >> >> I've been advised that Bruce Forster passed away suddenly on Tuesday. >> >> He was Ex-OTW,Ex-Superloop and currently Orgin. >> I was lucky enough to enjoy a beer with him on GC at ausnog, but we kept >> getting interrupted with all the people who wanted to say hi because he was >> such an awesome human. >> >> Bruce?s passing is a huge loss to the industry. >> >> I will provide service details when received. >> >> RIP. >> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net >> https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From cameron.ferdinands at gmail.com Thu Feb 15 13:54:53 2024 From: cameron.ferdinands at gmail.com (Cameron) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 12:54:53 +1000 Subject: [AusNOG] Vale Bruce Forster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Completely shattered Bruce was loved by everyone for his personality, as well as a frequent contributor to the Australian telecom community, volunteering his time for anyone that would ask. You most likely had a port patched by Bruce on an IX somewhere in Brisbane, or watched an online video with one of the caches he helped install. He made things happen. As a friend he was an amazing person and I can't thank him enough for all the support he's provided me over the years. I'll miss you Bruce On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 11:10, Russell Langton wrote: > Hi All, > > I've been advised that Bruce Forster passed away suddenly on Tuesday. > > He was Ex-OTW,Ex-Superloop and currently Orgin. > I was lucky enough to enjoy a beer with him on GC at ausnog, but we kept > getting interrupted with all the people who wanted to say hi because he was > such an awesome human. > > Bruce?s passing is a huge loss to the industry. > > I will provide service details when received. > > RIP. > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From k at rl.ag Thu Feb 15 14:23:40 2024 From: k at rl.ag (Karl Kloppenborg) Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2024 03:23:40 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] Vale Bruce Forster In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: What a horrible loss, I hope anyone close to the family offers support and relays the industries sentiment. He will be sorely missed. --Karl. From: AusNOG on behalf of Russell Langton Date: Thursday, 15 February 2024 at 12:10 pm To: ausnog Subject: [AusNOG] Vale Bruce Forster Hi All, I've been advised that Bruce Forster passed away suddenly on Tuesday. He was Ex-OTW,Ex-Superloop and currently Orgin. I was lucky enough to enjoy a beer with him on GC at ausnog, but we kept getting interrupted with all the people who wanted to say hi because he was such an awesome human. Bruce?s passing is a huge loss to the industry. I will provide service details when received. RIP. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From gogroup.au at gmail.com Fri Feb 16 12:57:54 2024 From: gogroup.au at gmail.com (Go Group - GEO Gurus) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:27:54 +1030 Subject: [AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? Message-ID: G'Day Guys I'm a newbie here so hope !'m ! breaking any rules posting about a LAN ? I was checking a regional SA iinet DHCP set static IP config.& noticed that the GW is 203.217.8.255 in Tasmania. They are iinet customer 4 15+ years & have 9 static IPs If I tracert 203-217-8-bcast.perm.iinet.net.au ( 203.217.8.255 ) the 1st few hops r prefix 'adl-' so IT seems that having a state prefix is important at iiNET as far as host naming conventions go. Customer has a photo & screen shot of the router they had setup approx. 10 years ago & GW ( again DHCP set ) from this setup is a host with the prefix 'adl-' iinet bus. support are saying ' No Problem ' to fix & will not provide a Gateway IP 4 SA customers, but will provide DNS server IPs I was part of a team that managed the most popular website in the southern hemisphere & the largest windows server / vmware network in the southern hemisphere so I know about vmotion etc. & why we need to keep secrets but why does iinet have a secret SA gateway !!! Any1 else in SA who has an iinet customer & can check their routers GW IP ? TIA Ken G. - Go G. GEO Guru -- Enjoy the experience of software from downunder that keeps you on top. ..--_|\ Go Group / OZ \ Suite 762 \ _.--._ / 25-27 BAROSSA VALLEY WAY v Barossa Valley SA 5351 .) .) http://gogroup.au A Go Geo URL ( GGU ) - *http://10fosst.5351.5o.au/ * http://5575.5o.au http://5576.5o.au http://surfside.5o.au - http:// *roseworthy.5o.au * http://Lyndoch.5o.au Smile its free -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From k at rl.ag Fri Feb 16 13:04:28 2024 From: k at rl.ag (Karl Kloppenborg) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 02:04:28 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Just checking, it?s Friday yes? --Karl. From: AusNOG on behalf of Go Group - GEO Gurus Date: Friday, 16 February 2024 at 12:58 pm To: ausnog at lists.ausnog.net Subject: [AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? G'Day Guys I'm a newbie here so hope !'m ! breaking any rules posting about a LAN ? I was checking a regional SA iinet DHCP set static IP config.& noticed that the GW is 203.217.8.255 in Tasmania. They are iinet customer 4 15+ years & have 9 static IPs If I tracert 203-217-8-bcast.perm.iinet.net.au ( 203.217.8.255 ) the 1st few hops r prefix 'adl-' so IT seems that having a state prefix is important at iiNET as far as host naming conventions go. Customer has a photo & screen shot of the router they had setup approx. 10 years ago & GW ( again DHCP set ) from this setup is a host with the prefix 'adl-' iinet bus. support are saying ' No Problem ' to fix & will not provide a Gateway IP 4 SA customers, but will provide DNS server IPs I was part of a team that managed the most popular website in the southern hemisphere & the largest windows server / vmware network in the southern hemisphere so I know about vmotion etc. & why we need to keep secrets but why does iinet have a secret SA gateway !!! Any1 else in SA who has an iinet customer & can check their routers GW IP ? TIA Ken G. - Go G. GEO Guru -- Enjoy the experience of software from downunder that keeps you on top. ..--_|\ Go Group / OZ \ Suite 762 \ _.--._ / 25-27 BAROSSA VALLEY WAY v Barossa Valley SA 5351 .) .) http://gogroup.au A Go Geo URL ( GGU ) - http://10fosst.5351.5o.au/ http://5575.5o.au http://5576.5o.au http://surfside.5o.au - http://roseworthy.5o.au http://Lyndoch.5o.au Smile its free -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From marktees at gmail.com Fri Feb 16 13:18:08 2024 From: marktees at gmail.com (Mark Tees) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 12:18:08 +1000 Subject: [AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It?s a secret proxy ARP?d anycast?d BNG gateway. On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 12:04, Karl Kloppenborg wrote: > Just checking, it?s Friday yes? > > > > --Karl. > > > > *From: *AusNOG on behalf of Go Group - > GEO Gurus > *Date: *Friday, 16 February 2024 at 12:58 pm > *To: *ausnog at lists.ausnog.net > *Subject: *[AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW > 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? > > G'Day Guys > > > > I'm a newbie here so hope !'m ! breaking any rules posting about a LAN ? > > > > I was checking a regional SA iinet DHCP set static IP config.& noticed > that the GW is 203.217.8.255 in Tasmania. > > > > They are iinet customer 4 15+ years & have 9 static IPs > > > > If I tracert 203-217-8-bcast.perm.iinet.net.au ( 203.217.8.255 ) the 1st > few hops r prefix 'adl-' so IT seems that having a state prefix is > important at iiNET as far as host naming conventions go. > > > > Customer has a photo & screen shot of the router they had setup approx. 10 > years ago & GW ( again DHCP set ) from this setup is a host with the prefix > 'adl-' > > > > iinet bus. support are saying ' No Problem ' to fix & will not provide a > Gateway IP 4 SA customers, but will provide DNS server IPs > > > > I was part of a team that managed the most popular website in the southern > hemisphere & the largest windows server / vmware network in the southern > hemisphere so I know about vmotion etc. & why we need to keep secrets but > why does iinet have a secret SA gateway !!! > > > > Any1 else in SA who has an iinet customer & can check their routers GW IP ? > > > > TIA > > > > Ken G. - Go G. > > GEO Guru > > > > -- > > > > Enjoy the experience of software from downunder that keeps you on top. > > ..--_|\ Go Group > / OZ \ Suite 762 > > \ _.--._ / 25-27 BAROSSA VALLEY WAY > > v Barossa Valley SA 5351 > > > .) .) > http://gogroup.au > > > > A Go Geo URL ( GGU ) - *http://10fosst.5351.5o.au/ > * > > > > http://5575.5o.au http://5576.5o.au > > > http://surfside.5o.au - http:// *roseworthy.5o.au > * > > http://Lyndoch.5o.au > > > Smile its free > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From rendrag at rendrag.net Fri Feb 16 13:41:58 2024 From: rendrag at rendrag.net (Damien Gardner Jnr) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 13:41:58 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: Wait, why is iiNet sending this guy's traffic via the American Republican Party and the British National Guard?? On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 13:18, Mark Tees wrote: > It?s a secret proxy ARP?d anycast?d BNG gateway. > > On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 12:04, Karl Kloppenborg wrote: > >> Just checking, it?s Friday yes? >> >> >> >> --Karl. >> >> >> >> *From: *AusNOG on behalf of Go Group - >> GEO Gurus >> *Date: *Friday, 16 February 2024 at 12:58 pm >> *To: *ausnog at lists.ausnog.net >> *Subject: *[AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW >> 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? >> >> G'Day Guys >> >> >> >> I'm a newbie here so hope !'m ! breaking any rules posting about a LAN ? >> >> >> >> I was checking a regional SA iinet DHCP set static IP config.& noticed >> that the GW is 203.217.8.255 in Tasmania. >> >> >> >> They are iinet customer 4 15+ years & have 9 static IPs >> >> >> >> If I tracert 203-217-8-bcast.perm.iinet.net.au ( 203.217.8.255 ) the 1st >> few hops r prefix 'adl-' so IT seems that having a state prefix is >> important at iiNET as far as host naming conventions go. >> >> >> >> Customer has a photo & screen shot of the router they had setup approx. >> 10 years ago & GW ( again DHCP set ) from this setup is a host with the >> prefix 'adl-' >> >> >> >> iinet bus. support are saying ' No Problem ' to fix & will not provide a >> Gateway IP 4 SA customers, but will provide DNS server IPs >> >> >> >> I was part of a team that managed the most popular website in the >> southern hemisphere & the largest windows server / vmware network in the >> southern hemisphere so I know about vmotion etc. & why we need to keep >> secrets but why does iinet have a secret SA gateway !!! >> >> >> >> Any1 else in SA who has an iinet customer & can check their routers GW IP >> ? >> >> >> >> TIA >> >> >> >> Ken G. - Go G. >> >> GEO Guru >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> >> Enjoy the experience of software from downunder that keeps you on top. >> >> ..--_|\ Go Group >> / OZ \ Suite 762 >> >> \ _.--._ / 25-27 BAROSSA VALLEY WAY >> >> v Barossa Valley SA 5351 >> >> >> .) .) >> http://gogroup.au >> >> >> >> A Go Geo URL ( GGU ) - *http://10fosst.5351.5o.au/ >> * >> >> >> >> http://5575.5o.au http://5576.5o.au >> >> >> http://surfside.5o.au - http:// *roseworthy.5o.au >> * >> >> http://Lyndoch.5o.au >> >> >> Smile its free >> _______________________________________________ >> AusNOG mailing list >> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net >> https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog >> > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog > -- Damien Gardner Jnr VK2TDG. Dip EE. GradIEAust rendrag at rendrag.net - http://www.rendrag.net/ -- We rode on the winds of the rising storm, We ran to the sounds of thunder. We danced among the lightning bolts, and tore the world asunder -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From markzzzsmith at gmail.com Fri Feb 16 19:46:44 2024 From: markzzzsmith at gmail.com (Mark Smith) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 19:46:44 +1100 Subject: [AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: It's likely that their DNS PTR records are out of date for their network. Fairly common issue. On Fri, 16 Feb 2024 at 12:58, Go Group - GEO Gurus wrote: > > G'Day Guys > > I'm a newbie here so hope !'m ! breaking any rules posting about a LAN ? > > I was checking a regional SA iinet DHCP set static IP config.& noticed that the GW is 203.217.8.255 in Tasmania. > > They are iinet customer 4 15+ years & have 9 static IPs > > If I tracert 203-217-8-bcast.perm.iinet.net.au ( 203.217.8.255 ) the 1st few hops r prefix 'adl-' so IT seems that having a state prefix is important at iiNET as far as host naming conventions go. > > Customer has a photo & screen shot of the router they had setup approx. 10 years ago & GW ( again DHCP set ) from this setup is a host with the prefix 'adl-' > > iinet bus. support are saying ' No Problem ' to fix & will not provide a Gateway IP 4 SA customers, but will provide DNS server IPs > > I was part of a team that managed the most popular website in the southern hemisphere & the largest windows server / vmware network in the southern hemisphere so I know about vmotion etc. & why we need to keep secrets but why does iinet have a secret SA gateway !!! > > Any1 else in SA who has an iinet customer & can check their routers GW IP ? > > TIA > > Ken G. - Go G. > GEO Guru > > -- > > Enjoy the experience of software from downunder that keeps you on top. > > ..--_|\ Go Group > / OZ \ Suite 762 > \ _.--._ / 25-27 BAROSSA VALLEY WAY > v Barossa Valley SA 5351 > > .) .) > http://gogroup.au > > A Go Geo URL ( GGU ) - http://10fosst.5351.5o.au/ > > http://5575.5o.au http://5576.5o.au > http://surfside.5o.au - http://roseworthy.5o.au > http://Lyndoch.5o.au > > Smile its free > _______________________________________________ > AusNOG mailing list > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net > https://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From shaun at ewing.au Fri Feb 16 20:39:56 2024 From: shaun at ewing.au (Shaun Ewing) Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2024 09:39:56 +0000 Subject: [AusNOG] iinet secret SA gateway - reg. cust. with iinet GW 203.217.8.255 is in Tas ? In-Reply-To: References: Message-ID: I had a /29 in that range back in 2002 ? my custom PTRs are still in place for that service which was cancelled over 20 years ago. It wouldn?t surprise me at all. On 16/2/2024, 7:47?pm, "AusNOG on behalf of Mark Smith" on behalf of markzzzsmith at gmail.com> wrote: It's likely that their DNS PTR records are out of date for their network. Fairly common issue. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: From davidphe at gmail.com Wed Feb 28 15:50:25 2024 From: davidphe at gmail.com (David Phelan) Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2024 14:50:25 +1000 Subject: [AusNOG] CFP - NZNOG - 11-12 April 2024 Message-ID: NZNOG 2024 Call for Presentations The NZNOG Trustees invite presentation proposals for the 21th NZNOG conference, to be hosted at the Rutherford Hotel in Nelson on April 11 and 12, 2024. Conference objective The NZNOG conference, workshops and tutorials are an opportunity for individuals and organisations involved in Internet operations to meet and share the latest in Internet operations, technologies, practices and receive high quality training. The event is unique in New Zealand and attracts technical, skilled individuals with a genuine interest in Internet operations and Internetworking technologies. Submissions on any aspect of networking are welcome however we are particularly interested in presentations that involve real world deployment experience, particularly in New Zealand. We are intending that this conference is an in-person event. We would like to maintain the high level of NZ based presenters and content that we had in 2023. We will also be accepting presentations from overseas speakers who can attend NZNOG in person. We do reserve the option of video presentation for highly valuable presentations but this is not our preference. Conference registration for accepted presenters will be free. Submit a proposal Presenters are invited to submit presentation proposals for consideration by 28 February, 2024. Talks may be accepted as they are received. Please provide your talk title, a short presenter bio and a description of the proposed presentation. Description should be no more than one page long and provide a summary of your networking related subject matter. Normally presentations are 30 min long, are video streamed live and slide decks are posted to the NZNOG website. If you want a different duration or other arrangements please let us know at submission time. To submit your proposal please e-mail: talks at nznog.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: