[AusNOG] Borrowed addresses, data retention, court orders etc.

Shane Short shane at short.id.au
Sun Jan 29 17:51:39 EST 2017


Maybe you should pay more attention to said emails. Google suggests your 
"theispguy.com" domain is malware infested. :)


Skeeve Stevens wrote:
> Hey Ross,
>
> You have obligations for YOUR "network". That doesn't relate to IP 
> addresses.
>
> My name is still on dozens of ranges that I managed at some point. I 
> get spam whinging emails all the time even though they haven't been a 
> customer for 10 years.
>
> You have zero issues here. Simply say it is not on your network and to 
> go away.
>
>
> ...Skeeve
>
> *Skeeve Stevens - Founder & The Architect* - eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
> Email: skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com 
> <mailto:skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com> ; Web: eintellegonetworks.com 
> <http://eintellegonetworks.com/>
>
> Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; Skype: skeeve ; LinkedIn: /in/skeeve 
> <http://linkedin.com/in/skeeve> ; Expert360: Profile 
> <https://expert360.com/profile/d54a9> ; Keybase: https://keybase.io/skeeve
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Ross Wheeler <ausnog at rossw.net 
> <mailto:ausnog at rossw.net>> wrote:
>
>
>     Presently a hypothetical question, but I'm sure it'll come up.
>
>     A friend of mine of a couple of decades runs an ISP in another
>     state thousands of km from me. His business and mine are
>     unrelated, have no common directors, funding, stakeholders etc.
>     Ie, completely "unrelated parties" save that he and I are friends.
>
>     Some time ago, during a relocation, he needed some addresses, I
>     just happened to have a /24 that I had recently moved services
>     from and it was mostly "vacant" and was fairly easy for me to peel
>     it out and lend it to him.
>
>     It's still in my name, assigned and "owned" by me, not him,
>     although it is being advertised via his provider and delivered
>     over his link(s) to service his servers and customers.
>
>     In time to come, if one of "his" users does something that "the
>     authorities" have reason to want to delve into in more detail, and
>     they know that a.b.c.d (being an address in my range "on loan to"
>     him) is the address they're interested in... how does "an
>     approved" party (be that a minister, a policeman, a court or
>     whoever) go about determining who they ask/demand information from?
>
>     If they simply look up the apnic database and issue a "demand" to
>     me, for example, I will have absolutely no way to give them the
>     data. While I could refer them to my friend, have I got my neck in
>     the noose here too?
>
>     R.
>     _______________________________________________
>     AusNOG mailing list
>     AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net <mailto:AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net>
>     http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>     <http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20170129/4f228b6d/attachment.html>


More information about the AusNOG mailing list