[AusNOG] Data Retention - are you kidding me??
ausnog at rossw.net
Thu Nov 17 10:58:31 EST 2016
On Wed, 16 Nov 2016, Karl Kloppenborg wrote:
> Whilst I'm sure all that is in jest, I believe those sorts of measures
> whilst not explicitly defined by the act could be seen obstruction of
Agreed. One of the things that IS explicitly stated elsewhere is that we
have an obligation to assist law enforcement officers, while walking a
possibly fine line between not breaking privacy and disclosure laws. If
all other conditions are met, I doubt that providing the information in
Swahili, encrypted or otherwise obfuscated would be considered satisfying
That said, I don't believe there's any obligation on us to decode,
summarise or explain (for example) flow logs or maillogs.
> Then again I'm no lawyer, personally this whole act is very convoluted
> and murky.
More information about the AusNOG