[AusNOG] Netflix Peering in AU

Skeeve Stevens skeeve+ausnog at theispguy.com
Sun Apr 5 12:45:25 EST 2015


I've been warning people about CVC costs and the coming SVOD revolution for
about a year now, and in my ISP network management service we have been
dealing with the AGVC problem since Presto hit (little bump) and Stans free
trial (big bump) and now Netflix with free trial (massive bump) - has been
an issue since late last year.  It will be worse by the end of the year....
and there are other SVOD coming that is going to cause even more problems
which won't have standard peering (at least initially).

It all depends what kind of demographics you have in your customer base and
how you buy your tails and what kind of tails they are - not everything has
AGVC.

Even Telstra, TPG and others are going to have problems with AGVC across to
NBNCo...   that is probably the reason TPG doesn't offer its IPTV product
on its NBN tails, but does on DSL and FTTB where their backhaul is free.


...Skeeve


--

Skeeve Stevens - The ISP Guy

Email: skeeve at theispguy.com ; Twitter: @TheISPGuy
<http://t.signaledue.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XX43LyyXnW4X9_h03N1zK2W653gwx56dStDf4-GSnR02?t=https%3A%2F%2Ftwitter.com%2FTheISPGuy&si=4640016326721536&pi=222a19c9-04a2-4e04-dcb8-c1a8735525db>
Blog: TheISPGuy.com
<http://t.signaledue.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XX43LyyXnW4X9_h03N1zK2W653gwx56dStDf4-GSnR02?t=http%3A%2F%2Ftheispguy.com%2F&si=4640016326721536&pi=222a19c9-04a2-4e04-dcb8-c1a8735525db>
;
Facebook: TheISPGuy
<http://t.signaledue.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XX43LyyXnW4X9_h03N1zK2W653gwx56dStDf4-GSnR02?t=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Ftheispguy&si=4640016326721536&pi=222a19c9-04a2-4e04-dcb8-c1a8735525db>

Linkedin: /in/skeeve
<http://t.signaledue.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XX43LyyXnW4X9_h03N1zK2W653gwx56dStDf4-GSnR02?t=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.linkedin.com%2Fin%2Fskeeve&si=4640016326721536&pi=222a19c9-04a2-4e04-dcb8-c1a8735525db>
 ; Expert360: Profile
<http://t.signaledue.com/e1t/c/5/f18dQhb0S7lC8dDMPbW2n0x6l2B9nMJW7t5XX43LyyXnW4X9_h03N1zK2W653gwx56dStDf4-GSnR02?t=https%3A%2F%2Fexpert360.com%2Fprofile%2Fd54a9&si=4640016326721536&pi=222a19c9-04a2-4e04-dcb8-c1a8735525db>


On Sun, Apr 5, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Mark McKibbin <mark at team.dcsi.net.au>
wrote:

> Yes the CVC costs are the elephant in the room that no one is talking
> about.
>
> [image: DCSI Logo]
>
> *Mark McKibbin*
> Director
>
>
>
> DCS Internet Pty Ltd | 64 Queen St, Warragul VIC 3820
> W: www.dcsi.net.au | P: 03 5624 1111 | M: 0419 515 606
>
> On 5 April 2015 at 10:02, Ben Grubb <bgrubb at smh.com.au> wrote:
>
>> One extra point to add to this:
>>
>> Internet prices are going to have to go up if NBN CVC doesn't go down and
>> SVOD take up continues at the current rate. Prices are also going to have
>> to go up on off-net DSL I suspect as well.
>>
>> Food for thought.
>>
>> On 5 April 2015 at 09:52, Ben Grubb <bgrubb at smh.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> If anything, people should be questioning why Netflix decided to have
>>> them removed. Not very transparent in my view... but I suspect it was
>>> because they didn't want to be associated with 'slowing down the internet'.
>>>
>>> Conversely, perhaps they didn't realise their traffic graphs were public.
>>>
>>> What I find really interesting at the moment is that Netflix could
>>> actually be a very good arguing point for smaller carriers to get NBN Co's
>>> $17.50 per Mbps CVC charge reduced, and the 121 points of interconnect
>>> reduced.
>>>
>>> If everyone is averaging 4Mbps during peak periods you're all going to
>>> have to provision for that.
>>>
>>> Add the access charge on top of that and you're going to be making very
>>> little money.
>>>
>>> Phil Dobbie did a good podcast on this last week:
>>> http://whirlpool.net.au/news/go.cfm?article=88059
>>>
>>> What also surprised me was iiNet underestimating how popular Netflix
>>> would be.
>>>
>>> They've been putting up a dozen fault notices over the last few days
>>> recognising backhaul issues in peak periods:
>>> http://www.iinet.net.au/status/fault.php?id=3893465
>>> http://www.iinet.net.au/status/fault.php?id=3853439
>>> http://www.iinet.net.au/status/fault.php?id=3845149
>>> etc etc
>>>
>>> iiNet's CEO initially blamed Telstra for Mass Service Disruptions for
>>> slow speeds but it was not related to that.
>>>
>>> At least they're being transparent about it I guess with fault notices :)
>>>
>>>
>>> On 5 April 2015 at 09:41, Shayne <shayne.mcc at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I agree. The graphs were public.
>>>>
>>>> Any complaints is about not being able to see them again which is a
>>>> shame... and its all about pointing the blame at someone
>>>>
>>>> At the end of the day it's not Ben's fault even If this article was the
>>>> cause.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 05/04/2015 9:31 am, "Ben Grubb" <bgrubb at smh.com.au> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> "I suggest that in future when you write a story that utilises
>>>>> publicly available data"
>>>>>
>>>>> As Simon Lyall has pointed out, these were actually public graphs.
>>>>> There was no password protection on them.
>>>>>
>>>>> Type "IX Australia graphs" into Google and you'll find them straight
>>>>> away.
>>>>>
>>>>> By the way, the graphs I used are actually still public - I didn't
>>>>> actually use the Netflix port ones as images, though I did link to them.
>>>>>
>>>>> There was no "redo" of the data - it was simply WYSIWYG with a grey
>>>>> background to compensate for the width of the article, as explained
>>>>> earlier. The source of the data was also clearly stated in the article.
>>>>>
>>>>> Again, I don't understand what the complaint is. These were not super
>>>>> secret graphs...
>>>>>
>>>>> On 5 April 2015 at 00:02, Peter Lawler <ausnog at bleeter.id.au> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> On 04/04/15 02:33, Ben Grubb wrote:
>>>>>> > It's funny because I didn't
>>>>>> > actually sensationalise it like you are suggesting
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suspect that point is, Ben, that you didn't need to. You've, in your
>>>>>> mind at least, simply done your job and any collateral damage that you
>>>>>> may have caused is none of your concern or responsibility, either
>>>>>> morally or ethically.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I suggest that in future when you write a story that utilises publicly
>>>>>> available data, you don't simply screenshot and rejig the background.
>>>>>> Redo the stuff entirely, that way sources may not get pissed off at
>>>>>> their data being used for what they may believe be purposes for which
>>>>>> it
>>>>>> was not intended.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Pete.
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
>>>>> files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>>>>> use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this
>>>>> e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to
>>>>> copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated
>>>>> without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received
>>>>> this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail
>>>>> or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the
>>>>> accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or
>>>>> attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax
>>>>> Media does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message
>>>>> or attached files.
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>
>> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
>> files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>> use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this
>> e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to
>> copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated
>> without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received
>> this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail
>> or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the
>> accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or
>> attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax
>> Media does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message
>> or attached files.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> AusNOG mailing list
>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150405/43abf12d/attachment.html>


More information about the AusNOG mailing list