[AusNOG] Netflix Peering in AU

[Ben Grubb]

One extra point to add to this:

Internet prices are going to have to go up if NBN CVC doesn't go down and
SVOD take up continues at the current rate. Prices are also going to have
to go up on off-net DSL I suspect as well.

Food for thought.

On 5 April 2015 at 09:52, Ben Grubb <bgrubb at smh.com.au> wrote:

> If anything, people should be questioning why Netflix decided to have them
> removed. Not very transparent in my view... but I suspect it was because
> they didn't want to be associated with 'slowing down the internet'.
>
> Conversely, perhaps they didn't realise their traffic graphs were public.
>
> What I find really interesting at the moment is that Netflix could
> actually be a very good arguing point for smaller carriers to get NBN Co's
> $17.50 per Mbps CVC charge reduced, and the 121 points of interconnect
> reduced.
>
> If everyone is averaging 4Mbps during peak periods you're all going to
> have to provision for that.
>
> Add the access charge on top of that and you're going to be making very
> little money.
>
> Phil Dobbie did a good podcast on this last week:
> http://whirlpool.net.au/news/go.cfm?article=88059
>
> What also surprised me was iiNet underestimating how popular Netflix would
> be.
>
> They've been putting up a dozen fault notices over the last few days
> recognising backhaul issues in peak periods:
> http://www.iinet.net.au/status/fault.php?id=3893465
> http://www.iinet.net.au/status/fault.php?id=3853439
> http://www.iinet.net.au/status/fault.php?id=3845149
> etc etc
>
> iiNet's CEO initially blamed Telstra for Mass Service Disruptions for slow
> speeds but it was not related to that.
>
> At least they're being transparent about it I guess with fault notices :)
>
>
> On 5 April 2015 at 09:41, Shayne <shayne.mcc at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I agree. The graphs were public.
>>
>> Any complaints is about not being able to see them again which is a
>> shame... and its all about pointing the blame at someone
>>
>> At the end of the day it's not Ben's fault even If this article was the
>> cause.
>>
>>
>> On 05/04/2015 9:31 am, "Ben Grubb" <bgrubb at smh.com.au> wrote:
>>
>>> "I suggest that in future when you write a story that utilises publicly available
>>> data"
>>>
>>> As Simon Lyall has pointed out, these were actually public graphs. There
>>> was no password protection on them.
>>>
>>> Type "IX Australia graphs" into Google and you'll find them straight
>>> away.
>>>
>>> By the way, the graphs I used are actually still public - I didn't
>>> actually use the Netflix port ones as images, though I did link to them.
>>>
>>> There was no "redo" of the data - it was simply WYSIWYG with a grey
>>> background to compensate for the width of the article, as explained
>>> earlier. The source of the data was also clearly stated in the article.
>>>
>>> Again, I don't understand what the complaint is. These were not super
>>> secret graphs...
>>>
>>> On 5 April 2015 at 00:02, Peter Lawler <ausnog at bleeter.id.au> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04/04/15 02:33, Ben Grubb wrote:
>>>> > It's funny because I didn't
>>>> > actually sensationalise it like you are suggesting
>>>>
>>>> I suspect that point is, Ben, that you didn't need to. You've, in your
>>>> mind at least, simply done your job and any collateral damage that you
>>>> may have caused is none of your concern or responsibility, either
>>>> morally or ethically.
>>>>
>>>> I suggest that in future when you write a story that utilises publicly
>>>> available data, you don't simply screenshot and rejig the background.
>>>> Redo the stuff entirely, that way sources may not get pissed off at
>>>> their data being used for what they may believe be purposes for which it
>>>> was not intended.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Pete.
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying
>>> files is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any
>>> use, dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this
>>> e-mail or any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to
>>> copyright. No part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated
>>> without the written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received
>>> this e-mail in error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail
>>> or telephone and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the
>>> accuracy or completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or
>>> attached files. Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax
>>> Media does not accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message
>>> or attached files.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> AusNOG mailing list
>>> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
>>> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
>>>
>>>
>

-- 
The information contained in this e-mail message and any accompanying files 
is or may be confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, any use, 
dissemination, reliance, forwarding, printing or copying of this e-mail or 
any attached files is unauthorised. This e-mail is subject to copyright. No 
part of it should be reproduced, adapted or communicated without the 
written consent of the copyright owner. If you have received this e-mail in 
error please advise the sender immediately by return e-mail or telephone 
and delete all copies. Fairfax Media does not guarantee the accuracy or 
completeness of any information contained in this e-mail or attached files. 
Internet communications are not secure, therefore Fairfax Media does not 
accept legal responsibility for the contents of this message or attached 
files.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20150405/4f07d271/attachment.html>