[AusNOG] another ipv6 Q

[Skeeve Stevens]

Yes, a v4/22 is 1994, and a v6/32 are both 1994 each.

Check out the calculator: http://submit.apnic.net/cgi-bin/feecalc.pl


...Skeeve

*Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com

Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve

facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
linkedin.com/in/skeeve

twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com


The Experts Who The Experts Call
Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering


On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:30 PM, Robert Hudson <hudrob at gmail.com> wrote:

> Sorry, I meant IPv4 /22 (at which point I believe I'd be correct, but am
> happy to be corrected).
>
> That's a terrible mechanical memory of mine, typing /24 all the time!
>
>
> On 3 July 2014 12:28, Skeeve Stevens <skeeve+ausnog at eintellegonetworks.com
> > wrote:
>
>> This would be incorrect Robert.
>>
>> A /24 is 1180
>> A /48 is 1180
>> A /32 is 1994
>>
>> So, you would pay 1994 if you had a /24 and /32
>>
>>
>>
>> ...Skeeve
>>
>> *Skeeve Stevens - *eintellego Networks Pty Ltd
>> skeeve at eintellegonetworks.com ; www.eintellegonetworks.com
>>
>> Phone: 1300 239 038; Cell +61 (0)414 753 383 ; skype://skeeve
>>
>> facebook.com/eintellegonetworks ;  <http://twitter.com/networkceoau>
>> linkedin.com/in/skeeve
>>
>> twitter.com/theispguy ; blog: www.theispguy.com
>>
>>
>> The Experts Who The Experts Call
>> Juniper - Cisco - Cloud - Consulting - IPv4 Brokering
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Robert Hudson <hudrob at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On 3 July 2014 11:48, Mark Andrews <marka at isc.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> In message <CAEUfUGPOheJKFW8yNUJ_Y=
>>>> wtOV978RaeXraMfLP82xQJXrB+0A at mail.gmail.com>, Skee
>>>> ve Stevens writes:
>>>> > --e89a8f8393fdab65e704fd3faae4
>>>> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
>>>> >
>>>> > Mark,
>>>> >
>>>> > To be accurate, ipv6 from APNIC is not $0.
>>>>
>>>> I said he could get IPv6 addresses for $0 based on the prerequiste
>>>> that he had IPv4 addresses from them.  I did not say how many
>>>> addresses he could get for $0 or that he could get unlimited IPv6
>>>> addresses because I couldn't be bothered running the calculator.
>>>>
>>>> > If your IPv6 allocation exceeds the value of the IPv4 allocation, you
>>>> will
>>>> > pay the greater of the two.
>>>>
>>>> Which is why the next sentence was "You pay MAX(IPv4 cost, IPv6 cost)."
>>>
>>>
>>>  If you have a /24 IPv4 allocation from APNIC, it is my understanding
>>> that you can get a /32 IPv6 allocation at no additional cost (and I believe
>>> it has infact already been allocated to you by default, you just need to
>>> claim it and start using it).
>>>
>>
>>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20140703/d4df04ec/attachment.html>