[AusNOG] IPv4

Alastair Johnson aj at sneep.net
Sat Mar 2 19:31:14 EST 2013


Sounds like a problem for the tunnel provider and the end-user trying to circumvent geo-restrictions.

In fact I'd say IPv6 did exactly what it was supposed to do in this case -- and I'd imagine the geo-restricting content provider would be inclined to agree.

-----Original Message-----
From: Graeme Allen <gallen at mytelecom.com.au>
Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:26:37 
To: <aj at sneep.net>
Reply-To: gallen at mytelecom.com.au
Cc: Joshua D'Alton<joshua at railgun.com.au>; ausnog at ausnog.net<ausnog at ausnog.net>
Subject: Re: [AusNOG] IPv4

Yes, I have IPv6 at home to, and it works fine, but here is a real first
hand story.....

- Battlestar Galactica Blood and Chrome released on Machinima Prime
(yeah, I'm a nerd)
- The studio has only allowed viewing in the USA
- I sign up for a US based VPN, get the tunnel up and working, happy
days
- Site still says video can't be watched from my location
- Scratch head for 20+ mins
- Finally realise the source is IPv6 and not going through the tunnel
- Check with tunnel provider, no IPv6 support
- Turn off IPv6 and Cylons a plenty

It's the corner cases that get you, and suck held desk resources.....



On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 08:18 +0000, Alastair Johnson wrote:
> Seems like an over-dramatization. Free.fr, Comcast, AT&T have had IPv6 available on their networks for some time without this sort of issue.
> 
> This is precisely what World IPv6 Day and World IPv6 Launch were about -- to combat this kind of thinking and prove that such a scenario is unlikely or extremely rare.
> 
> I have native IPv6 at home, on by default from my ISP (Comcast) and it just works. Oh, and 16% of my traffic goes over IPv6 every day. This number is so low only because the VPN terminator at my office is not yet IPv6 connected (but will be).
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Graeme Allen <gallen at mytelecom.com.au>
> Sender: ausnog-bounces at lists.ausnog.net
> Date: Sat, 02 Mar 2013 19:08:13 
> To: Joshua D'Alton<joshua at railgun.com.au>
> Reply-To: gallen at mytelecom.com.au
> Cc: ausnog at ausnog.net<ausnog at ausnog.net>
> Subject: Re: [AusNOG] IPv4
> 
> It's Saturday, and I'm a bit bored, apologies in advance for any offense
> caused.....
> 
> [IPv6 - Scene #1]
> 
> [Hipster #1] - Hey did you notice that the InstaFaceGramGrinderSpace
> thingy hasn't worked properly since Sunday night? Hey, Nathanyall, you
> know about computers, didn't you queue for 3 days for your new phone? 
> 
> [Hipster#2] Yeah, but have an iPhone and Mac, everything works perfectly
> for me, you should get a mac. Why is my Frappe taking so long?
> 
> [Slightly outcast acquaintance #1] Don't you use the same ISP as me?
> 
> [Hipster #1] IS what now? I've got a notebook, HP I think.
> 
> [Slightly outcast acquaintance #1] Don't worry. Didn't you get an email
> from HyperMegaNet about them turning on IPv6 last week, if you wanted to
> opt-out there was a link to a form where you could say no.
> 
> [Hipster #1] Do you mean Facebook? Right, so someone broke my internet
> and now I have to call them to fix it, what's their number?
> 
> [ISP Help desk operator] - Hello Jaamie, how can I help you?
> 
> [Hipster #1] - My InstaFaceGramGrinderSpace is broken, apparently you
> turned on i6 on Sunday and now nothing works, I want it put back the way
> it was, now.
> 
> [ISP Help desk operator] - We did send you an IPv6 opt-out form. If you
> just have a minute I am sure we can get your PC working properly again.
> 
> [Hipster #1] - I don't have a minute, I want it put back the way it
> was ,now, it's not my problem, I want to speak to a manager. I saw an ad
> on a tram for internet that was half the price I pay you.
> 
> [ISP Help desk operator] - I understand sir, I'll put it back now, it
> will just take a moment, there, done, sorry for the inconvenience.
> 
> [Hipster #1] Thankyou, please don't do that again.
> 
> [ISP Manager] - Why did we turn on IPv6 again?
> 
> [Network Manager] - We have to migrate people to IPv6 because.........
> 
> [approx 8 minutes pass]
> 
> [ISP Manager] - Are we charging more for it?
> 
> [Network Manager] - No
> 
> [ISP Manager] - Can people do more with it?
> 
> [Network Manager] - No
> 
> [ISP Manager] - Does it lower our costs?
> 
> [Network Manager] - No, it sort of increases them in the short term
> 
> [ISP Manager] - How many extra calls have we had per day since?
> 
> [Network Manager] - About a 300% increase
> 
> [ISP Help Desk Manager] - You're fired.
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> IP what now? 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sat, 2013-03-02 at 18:20 +1100, Joshua D'Alton wrote:
> > Cheers Bevan
> > 
> > 
> > The solution to 1. is to charge full economic prices for things, that
> > will hit people where their hearts are; their wallets. You could even
> > do it like the fee added on when you get your car serviced "oil
> > disposal".. instead it would be "IPv4 provisioning" or something like
> > that.
> > 
> > 
> > If all the drug dealers in "The Wire" could get together and sort out
> > there minor problems for a massive gain in cooperative bargaining,
> > then while it is a TV show, perhaps we can aspire to do the same
> > thing.
> > 
> > 
> > I'm not proposing serversaustralia and ozservers and nextDC be the
> > only ones to stick their necks out, but I don't think it would be seen
> > as conspiracy or market manipulation by the government were they to
> > get together and work out a plan that would see them all through the
> > next 5 years of transition. The reverse way of dealing it would be to
> > discount services that operate on IPv6-only, that might have less of
> > an impact on the customer.
> > 
> > 
> > Of course, that would actually require the cost of IPv4 going up, not
> > down like it has in this case. Still, if companies were made to pay
> > 10x what they are now for ip space, they might consider the current
> > pain vs future pain equation to start weighing heavily in the now.
> > 
> > On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:04 PM, Bevan Slattery
> > <Bevan.Slattery at nextdc.com> wrote:
> >         Thanks for the reply Joshua.  The issues in my mind are:
> >         
> >         
> >         1.  Lack of education and awareness with end-users
> >         2.  Lack of a coherent and seamless migration strategy
> >         (including tools) not just for industry/network operators but
> >         also for end-users
> >         3.  Poor management of limited resources (IP addresses)
> >         
> >         
> >         How can we expect users to plan for migration if the people
> >         who operate the networks themselves can't even articulate
> >         first what the problem is and secondly how to solve it?
> >         
> >         
> >         So unless us as an industry come up with a solution 2) and
> >         communicate 1) then all we have to rely on is efficient
> >         resource management 3).
> >         
> >         
> >         [b]
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         From: Joshua D'Alton <joshua at railgun.com.au>
> >         Date: Saturday, 2 March 2013 3:52 PM
> >         To: "ausnog at ausnog.net" <ausnog at ausnog.net>
> >         Subject: Re: [AusNOG] IPv4
> >         Resent-From: Bevan Slattery <bevan.slattery at nextdc.com>
> >         
> >         
> >         
> >         The unsaid thing here seems to be the cost, to the company, to
> >         the customers, to whoever. 
> >         
> >         
> >         I'd suggest that businesses that operate on low margins are
> >         always going to feel more threatened when their business model
> >         comes under attack, but that is their cross to bear not the
> >         internet communities'.
> >         
> >         
> >         When you have providers selling virtual servers for $5/month,
> >         dedicated IP/hosting for $3/month, dedicated servers for
> >         $99/month and so on, you start to have complaints from people
> >         who can't afford to role out IPv6, or are worried about losing
> >         their customer base if they try pass on some of the costs to
> >         them. Sure there are lots of companies complaining who do
> >         operate on high margins, and people on low margins not
> >         complaining, but they aren't the ones with a fundamental
> >         business model problem.
> >         
> >         
> >         It seems people have made their beds, and as painful as it is,
> >         they are going to have to sleep in them. The people still
> >         playing pass the parcel with this ticking time bomb when it
> >         goes off are going to take a far larger hit in 5 years than if
> >         they bite the bullet now and get IPv6 ready. And conversely,
> >         they are paying a much higher price now than they would have
> >         even 5 years ago.
> >         
> >         
> >         People complain about software not working properly with IPv6,
> >         well it might have been time to kick up a fuss about that 10
> >         years ago, not in 5 years time and still expect something to
> >         be done when the horse has well and truly bolted. We've had
> >         client-side IPv6 support for going on 10 years now, and while
> >         it isn't anywhere near perfect and there is still a lot to be
> >         done... well its all been said already.
> >         
> >         On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 3:17 PM, Bevan Slattery
> >         <Bevan.Slattery at nextdc.com> wrote:
> >                  Yes we have been running out for the last 10 years -
> >                 I get it.  But here's the news flash - we are going to
> >                 keep running out for at least the next 5, because the
> >                 network operator doesn't always determine the
> >                 timetable for migration of course and unless they
> >                 don't care about having customers.
> >                 
> >                 
> >         _______________________________________________ AusNOG mailing
> >         list AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> >         http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog 
> >         
> >         The information contained in this email and any attachments
> >         may be confidential. This email and any attachments are also
> >         subject to copyright. No part of them may be reproduced,
> >         adapted or transmitted without the written permission of the
> >         copyright owner. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> >         use, interference with, disclosure or copying of this
> >         information is unauthorised and prohibited. If you have
> >         received this email in error, please immediately advise the
> >         sender by return email and delete the message from your
> >         system. All email communications to and from NEXTDC Limited
> >         are recorded for the purposes of archival and storage.
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > AusNOG mailing list
> > AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> > http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog




More information about the AusNOG mailing list