[AusNOG] APNIC Slashes Costs for New Members
markzzzsmith at yahoo.com.au
Sat Mar 2 16:16:37 EST 2013
> From: Bevan Slattery <bevan at slattery.net.au>
>To: Mark Smith <markzzzsmith at yahoo.com.au>; "nathan at manageddatasolutions.com.au" <nathan at manageddatasolutions.com.au>; 'Mark Andrews' <marka at isc.org>; 'Jared Hirst' <jared.hirst at serversaustralia.com.au>
>Cc: "ausnog at lists.ausnog.net" <ausnog at lists.ausnog.net>
>Sent: Saturday, 2 March 2013 1:02 PM
>Subject: Re: [AusNOG] APNIC Slashes Costs for New Members
>On 2/03/13 12:47 PM, "Mark Smith" <markzzzsmith at yahoo.com.au> wrote:
>>>You either didn't read the rest of the post or seem to be interested in
>>>taking that sentence out of context when the rest of the post indicates
>>>all the pros and cons for a small business to accelerate investment in
>>>IPv6 (or not accelerating it beyond what's in the project plan).
>>Actually, it is completely in context.
>No it's not. You and others are simply ignoring much of what he is saying
>because it doesn't support your argument. You and others are playing the
>man and not the ball.
The context I was taking about, and the one I thought Nathan was commenting on was that because customers aren't specifically asking for IPv6 then ok to deploy IPv6 "when we get around to it". That approach may have been ok 5 to 10 years ago, but it is now becoming invalid.
More information about the AusNOG