[AusNOG] Vocus vs. Pipe - Was: Vocus peering traffic missingfrom PIPE-IX?

Brendan Baker brendan.baker at opengear.com
Thu Nov 8 14:29:25 EST 2012


Surely one can take the day shift, and the other the evening.


On 08/11/2012, at 1:03 PM, Phillip Grasso <phillip.grasso at gmail.com> wrote:

> thank you for one of the most entertaining threads in a long time. 
> 
> Lets speak about the elephant in the room, does this mean drinks will need to be paid for by someone else or are both parties going to organize outings on the same day to divide the customers ;-).
> 
> 
> On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Mark Newton <newton at atdot.dotat.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 01:51:25PM +1100, Chris Ricks wrote:
> 
>  > If the GoF did present at peering points, their businesses wouldn't
>  > suffer massively one would assume . They'd still sell plenty of transit
>  > to those not buying capacity on cable systems, large corporates would
>  > continue to buy from them due to their want for a single provider with
>  > national reach (which is debatable in value) and so on.
> 
> Why wouldn't large corporates peer?
> 
>   - mark
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog
> 
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20121108/bad89530/attachment.html>


More information about the AusNOG mailing list