[AusNOG] iiNet update

[Alan Arnott]

While I agree with celebrating the judgment in this case, let's not  
forget that this might only be the end of the battle but not the war.

I would tend to agree with the author of the following article  
regarding the likelihood of an appeal being instituted:

http://m.computerworld.com.au/article/335119/afact_v_iinet_legal_expert_says_it_far_from_over/

Regards,

Alan Arnott
Technology Lawyer

Sent from my iPhone.

This correspondence is issued on behalf of Arnotts Lawyers Jones Bay  
Wharf ABN 95 392 650 727, is confidential and intended solely for the  
use of the addressee(s). It may also be protected by legal privilege.  
Confidentiality and legal privilege are not waived or lost by reason  
of the mistaken delivery of this correspondence to you. You may not  
copy this correspondence or use or disclose its contents to anyone  
without our express consent. Liability limited by a scheme approved  
under Professional Standards Legislation. My business card is  
accessible via the following link: http://arnotts.net.au/AlanArnott.pdf

On 05/02/2010, at 8:30 AM, "Darren Worley" <darren at worley.org.au> wrote:

>> It was the only sensible verdict - it's nice to see there's
>> still some sanity left in our justice system.
>
>
> 'AFACT is to pay iiNet costs'
> It's nice to see there is some(albeit very small) still *justice*  
> left in
> our *legal* system.
>
> :Darren
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> AusNOG mailing list
> AusNOG at lists.ausnog.net
> http://lists.ausnog.net/mailman/listinfo/ausnog