[AusNOG] Google launches alternative DNS resolver

Matthew Moyle-Croft mmc at internode.com.au
Fri Dec 4 10:05:29 EST 2009


Sure,
I'm hoping they put some local stuff in.  But that doesn't help much.

GeoIP doesn't help resolving CDN caches because it doesn't know where 
the CDN caches are or what content they have.

eg. many of us have Akamai servers on-net - how does GeoIP know which 
customers to send where?  Even we don't understand the rhyme or reason 
of how Akamai does it.

We're not talking a few megabits here, we're talking multiple gigabits 
of content.   We're talking large amounts of money to cope with 
receiving that off net on the other side of the world.

Again, we're just casualties of a war going on elsewhere in the world.   
At best here this is a broadside aimed at people like Telstra who don't 
peer locally with Google and are playing funny games with their Bigpond 
resolvers ...

MMC

Scott Howard wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Matthew Moyle-Croft 
> <mmc at internode.com.au <mailto:mmc at internode.com.au>> wrote:
>
>     I think it's a great idea if you're North America centric.
>
>     But, it'll add 150ms or more to most customers and it'll hurt the
>     locality based services already in Australia.   So, performance in
>     Australia will suck.  eg.  Akamai becomes 300ms+ vs 25-50ms
>     depending on where you are.  Think how much traffic that means
>     bringing in from O/S?
>
>
> It's anycast, and it would seem logical that they will roll it out to 
> more datacenters over time.
>
> From both the US and Europe I'm seeing a maximum of about 20ms to get 
> to the nearest 8.8.8.8 server, and less than 50ms from much of Asia, 
> so it's neither centralised, nor North American centric.  Australia 
> seems to be an ugly cousin at the moment...
>
> Presuming the IP addresses they are using to originate the requests 
> back out are correctly listed in the various GeoIP databases then the 
> likes of Akamai shouldn't suffer at all.
>
> From Frankfurt :
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8>: icmp_seq=0 ttl=249 time=5.440 ms
>
> From London :
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8>: icmp_seq=0 ttl=249 time=13.734 ms
>
> From Washington DC :
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8>: icmp_seq=0 ttl=249 time=5.487 ms
>
> From Singaopre :
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8>: icmp_seq=0 ttl=246 time=51.271 ms
> (Hits Google IP space in Singapore, but the actual resolution is 
> elsewhere)
>
> From Tokyo :
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8>: icmp_seq=0 ttl=246 time=39.430 ms
>
> From Adelaide :
> 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8 <http://8.8.8.8>: icmp_seq=0 ttl=244 time=164.262 ms
> (Hits Google IP space in Sydney)
>
>
>   Scott
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.ausnog.net/pipermail/ausnog/attachments/20091204/ad6415ec/attachment.html>


More information about the AusNOG mailing list